Hackers In The News Archive

Local governments, businesses reassure safety of data following SC hack

MYRTLE BEACH, SC — Local governments and businesses keep some customer information, though not on the scale the state does.

Still, they do not want to deal with a similar data breach.

Horry Telephone Cooperative serves thousands of customers.

Its technicians use firewalls, intrusion detection, data encryption and virus protection.

“We’ve got six people on staff who either all or part of their job is to monitor the various levels of our network and make sure things are safe,” Tom Vitt, with HTC, said.

The company is not only concerned about cyber security in its buildings, but in your homes.

“Anybody who has a wireless network at home should make sure it is secured and only people who have a proper password can access the network,” Vitt said.

Your local government might have your Social Security number used to run credit checks when setting up a utility account.

But credit card numbers are usually not kept when people make payments.

For that reason, a hacker wouldn’t find much if trying to pry data from a small government entity. But still, cities work to keep the data private.

“Not only is it behind internal firewalls and external firewalls, it is encrypted on our computers,” Mark Kruea, spokesman for the city of Myrtle Beach, said.

The technology should work, in fact the greatest threat could come from humans.

“If somebody were to share information that they’re not supposed to share that would certainly be a concern but the data is reasonably well-protected we believe,” Kruea said.

You can take steps to prevent someone from accessing your personal information while you surf the web.

Don’t open strange attachments from people you don’t know, use a secure browser and use a firewall.

Source: http://www2.wbtw.com/news/2012/nov/14/local-governments-businesses-reassure-safety-data-ar-4971363/


http://www.GregoryDEvans.com, http://www.Locatepc.net, http://stolencomputeralert.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://www.hackerforhireusa.com, http://www.GregoryDEvans.net, AmIHackerProof.com, http://ParentSecurityOnline.com, http://TheCyberWars.com, http://hiphopsecurity.com, http://HackerForHireinternational.com, http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://computer-security-expert.com

Adobe Confirms Hacker Breach Of Connect Video Conferencing

Adobe has confirmed that the personal data of 150,000 users has been compromised after a hacker breach

On November 15, 2012 by Robert Lemos eWEEK USA 2012. Ziff Davis Enterprise Inc. All Rights Reserved 1

Adobe has reacted quickly after it admitted that its video conferencing service, Adobe Connect, has been compromised.

Adobe pulled down a forum for users of the Adobe Connect service, after a hacker successfully compromised the server and downloaded information on its 150,000 members.

Egyptian Hacker

The information taken from the server included each member’s name, username, company, title and email address as well as the hashed version of their password. In a statement posted to Pastebin on 13 November, the hacker – who claimed to be Egyptian – said that he would publicly post only the information for Adobe employees and users that work for the US Department of Defense or other government agencies.

“I’m not looking to ruin Adobe business so i will leak only (those) emails,” the post stated.

The compromise of Adobe’s ConnectUsers Forum is the latest breach of a major corporate Web service in the past two years. Hackers stole the passwords for 6.5 million LinkedIn users in June and leaked the passwords of approximately 400,000 Yahoo! Voices users in July.

In a blog post on its Connect Blog, Adobe confirmed the compromise and briefly stated the steps it has taken to fix the issues, including pulling down the service on the evening of 13 November and resetting the password of the affected users. The company will send out instructions to users on resetting their password once it restores the service, Adobe said in a statement.

“It does not appear that any other Adobe services, including the Adobe Connect conferencing service itself, were impacted,” Guillaume Privat, Director of Adobe’s Connect product said in the post.

Adobe recommended that all users change their passwords and follow the practice of using a different password for every Web service.

Password reuse is a major cause for concern when Web services are compromised. An attacker that compromises a minor site with poor security can use a password file to gain access to people’s accounts on sites and services with stronger security. Following the compromise of Yahoo Voices, for example, one security researcher found that 60 percent of the people who used both the Yahoo service and were also members of Sony Pictures, which was breached in 2011, used the same password.

It will likely not be long before a significant portion of the password list is decrypted. Brute-force decryption techniques have advanced to the point where attackers can quickly decrypt the most common passwords from their hashes. For example, 80 percent of the list of LinkedIn password were decrypted.

Security Efforts

The attack comes as Adobe has made very public efforts to weed out the vulnerabilities in its widely-used software, such as Adobe Acrobat and Flash. Since 2009, the company has focused on making its software harder to compromise and raising the level of effort that attackers have to expend to find and exploit vulnerabilities. Among the company’s major efforts: Adding automatic update mechanisms to its software and creating a secure product development lifecycle to find and fix vulnerabilities.

Despite Adobe’s efforts, the hacker cited the company’s allegedly slow response to issues as the reason for the latest attack.

“Adobe is a very big company but they don’t really take care of them security issues,” the hacker complained in the Pastebin post. “Such big companies should really respond very fast and fix the security issues as fast as they can.”

Source: http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/adobe-connect-breach-99174

Hi Tech Crime Solutions


http://www.GregoryDEvans.com, http://www.Locatepc.net, http://stolencomputeralert.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://www.hackerforhireusa.com, http://www.GregoryDEvans.net, AmIHackerProof.com, http://ParentSecurityOnline.com, http://TheCyberWars.com, http://hiphopsecurity.com, http://HackerForHireinternational.com, http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://computer-security-expert.com

Russian hackers beaten at their own game

Posted November 22, 2012 By NewsRoom

Russian hackers beaten at their own game

‘Honey pot’ traps agents turning computers into secret surveillance machines

Published: 11/12/2012 at 8:00 PM

author-image bySteve ElwartEmail | Archive

121110hackerz

In the world of cyber espionage, usually an attacker can lurk in the shadows unidentified, but through a combination of skill, timing and luck, one hacker has been exposed for all the world to see.

There are even pictures.

For years, the country of Georgia has accused Russia of making repeated attacks on their computer systems. Georgians have said that Moscow has probed their networks looking for classified information and planting computer viruses on their machines.

Georgia had little concrete evidence to prove these attacks were coming from Russia, but now, thanks to a lot of ingenuity and a little luck, they have not only identified where an attack was originating, but they have been able to put a face on an adversary.

In a recently released report, the Georgian government exposed the cyber attack from Russia and explained how Moscow used classic cyber warfare techniques to invade their national network, spreading a computer virus to steal closely held government information.

In addition to swiping documents, the computer virus could take control of a person’s webcam and take pictures of the victim. Hackers could also tap into the computer’s built-in microphone and listen in on private conversations without anyone the wiser.

In response, Georgia’s Computer Emergency Readiness Team, or CERT, was able to use Russia’s own cyber weapons against them and identify at least 390 computers that were exposed to attack. Seventy percent of the infected computers were based in Georgia, but computers in the United States, Canada, Ukraine, China and countries of Western Europe were also affected.

The infected computers were used primarily by the Georgian Parliament, government ministries, critical national infrastructures and non-government organizations.

In March 2011, CERT believed they were under attack by a hacker after a file on a computer belonging to a government official was flagged as “suspicious” by an antivirus program.

The virus was traced back to several Georgian websites that had been hacked and modified with the embedded virus.

The hacker’s attacks on the Georgian government were remarkably sophisticated. The hacker made his way onto Georgian news websites and infected articles that would attract the sort of readers he wanted to spy on. Only certain pages were infected, pages that would be of interest to just the readers that would have information on their computers the hacker would want to steal.

Once the virus loaded, it could search documents for specific words and then upload those documents to third-party servers for later retrieval.

Georgian news page with virus embedded in the code

The virus was also tuned to infect just those machines that were set to the local time in two time zones in Eastern Europe, the zones that covered Georgia. Even if the computers were located in other parts of the world, if their system time was set for one of these two time zones, they could be infected as well.

When the Georgians first became aware they may be under another attack, they set a trap for the hacker using a computer tool that has been around for over 20 years: the honey pot.

A honey pot is a trap set by computer professionals whose sole purpose is to entice a hacker into stealing it, much like its namesake Winnie the Pooh.

It is placed in a network that is made to look extremely valuable, but actually contains no useful information. In the case of the Georgian attack, the honey pot was a document named, “Georgian-NATO Agreement.”

The file, which contained the very same virus that Russia was using on Georgia, was placed in the document and like a baited hook, left dangling out on the network.

The hacker finally bit.

The hacker stole the file, and when it was opened, the virus was released, giving control of the hacker’s computer to the Georgians.

Picture of Russian hacker from his own webcam

To make the honey pot that much sweeter, CERT was able to get a clear video of the hacker at his computer.

Besides getting a clear video of the hacker, CERT was also able to capture the process of the hacker creating new malicious computer code.

The trap set by the Georgians was good for only 5-10 minutes, after which the hacker seemed to realize he had been hacked and dropped his connection, but by then it was too late.

CERT was able to examine the hackers’ files and determine the hacker’s city, Internet provider and email address. They were also able to retrieve a document, written in Russian, describing how the virus worked and how it targeted machines.

They also determined that the Internet provider the hacker used was registered to an address in Moscow belonging to the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, Department of Logistics, just down the street from the Russian Secret Service.

Links were also found tying the hacker to the cyber criminal group “Russian Business Network,” or RBN. One website, www.rbc.ru, was programmed directly into the virus to communicate back to the hackers if every other communication channel is closed. The official name for the website is “Russian Business Consulting,” a site that has links to the RBN.

CERT also discovered that 300 to 400 computers located in key government agencies were infected and transmitting sensitive documents to servers controlled by the hacker. The infected computers were also joined together in a remote controlled network called a “botnet.” This botnet controlled by the hacker was called “Georbot” (which was featured in a CERT report titled, “Georbot: From Russia with Love”).

After discovering the hack and where the documents were going, Georgia blocked connections to the servers receiving the documents, and the infected computers had the virus removed from their hard drives.

But despite the fact that the hacker knew he had been discovered, he redoubled his efforts. He sent a series of emails to government officials that appeared to come from the president of Georgia, with the address “admin@president.gov.ge.” Those emails also contained a virus embedded in an attachment that delivered the virus to those machines as well.

All of the evidence obtained by CERT led Georgia to the conclusion that that the hacker was part of a skilled team of cyber spies that have ties to Russian security agencies.

The hard lesson that Georgia has learned about being vulnerable to cyber attack is applicable to private individuals as well. Most home computer users do not realize that they are bringing into their home a powerful surveillance tool, one that can eavesdrop on conversations, watch their every movement near their computer, and follow every keystroke and mouse click they make.

What happened in Georgia could happen to anyone. There are now entire websites dedicated not only to trading personal information (i.e. credit card numbers and personal data) but also to trading images of “slaves” (usually women) whose computers have been infected and who are being spied upon, without their knowledge.

The other lesson of the Georbot is that criminals are not the only ones that want to spy on people, governments want to as well.

Source: http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/russian-hackers-beaten-at-their-own-game/

High Tech Crime Solutions


http://www.GregoryDEvans.com, http://www.Locatepc.net, http://stolencomputeralert.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://www.hackerforhireusa.com, http://www.GregoryDEvans.net, AmIHackerProof.com, http://ParentSecurityOnline.com, http://TheCyberWars.com, http://hiphopsecurity.com, http://HackerForHireinternational.com, http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://computer-security-expert.com

Hack Your Way to a Better Future

Posted November 22, 2012 By NewsRoom

Hack Your Way to a Better Future

This post (and several that will follow) co-authored with Rachel Hatch, Research Director at the Institute for the Future. Her info is at the end of each post.

In some business circles, hacking is becoming a virtuous thing to do.

We don’t mean cracking into corporate databases and sneaking away with passwords and credit-card info, or a competitors’ secret plans for world domination, but rather the process of applying quick, smart interventions to interesting opportunities, generating working prototypes in the time it would have taken to write a memo to convene a committee in the good old way of doing business.

Why hack?

Perhaps all that results in a single afternoon is a prototype, but let’s be honest, business is in perpetual beta and constantly changing.  Hacking is a way of catching up to the change. Side effects? Elation! We made a thing! Just like that!

Businesses are beginning to see that an injection of hacker culture is a useful way of shifting corporate culture away from its usual caution and bureaucracy.

Hacking offers a different way to relate to the world. You can test ideas immediately. Build working prototypes from simple, inexpensive piece parts. Connect with people who might use or buy your offer, and hear from them directly. All in very quick order.

Consider spending a single hacking afternoon with your team.  What you’re about to do is 21st Century skill-building.

It may feel counterintuitive to constrain hacking by putting too much of a process around it, but let us offer a straw-man structure for such an exercise from work developed at IFTF for its most recent Ten-Year Forecast (you can download the Map of the Decade from that forecast here).

This set of hacking media was designed to help people think through impossible future scenarios at that meeting.

The projects you might hack range wildly, from gathering data about gender issues from large numbers of people (how to reach that many?!), to prototyping a new corporate culture (yoga at four!) or a tasty floorwax (lemongrass?), to reimagining the fundamentals of a political party after its wan showing in a recent election. Let your imagination roam, but settle on a project.

Where to Start

The first step toward Hacking Your Future is to chose a hacker medium.  Start anywhere!

  1. Launch a Network: Jump-start a conversation with a curated crowd. Recruit them to get the word out and improve this initiative.
  2. Design the Future:  Tell a story about the future you want to create by making an artifact from that future.
  3. Publish a Manifesto: Tell the world why they should care about this initiative, with passion and verve.
  4. Prototype a Kickstarter Project: Channel your creative impulse to bring your future to life using crowdfunding.

We’ll dive into each of these four media options in subsequent posts here. For now, we keep you in suspense.  Use this time to block off an afternoon with your team.

Often corporations are stuck in Matrix-style “bullet time,” where everything seems to move really slowly (but the bullets aren’t all dodged).  A simple day of hacking can give employees a sense of permission and agency they may never have felt.

Imagine your standard cubicle inhabitants, tasked with hacking the future against the clock.  When hacking, their facial expressions are focused, charged.  Intense iterating is punctuated by laughter and moments of vulnerability.  It’s a reminder that fun is not the enemy of work.

What we’re describing here is principally in corporate settings, but it all applies to government agencies, non-profits, smaller businesses and more.

You might follow two different paths to choose among these hacking projects: fit to task or fit to person. By “fit to task,” we mean choosing the hack that seems best suited to your initiative; “fit to person” means that some people are uncomfortable shaking their social networks for most anything, but might love inventing an artifact from the future.

You may also want to step through each medium in turn, treating them as a boot camp for mobilizing in the new Millennium.

Whatever you decide, JFDI!

Hi Tech Crime Solutions


http://www.GregoryDEvans.com, http://www.Locatepc.net, http://stolencomputeralert.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://www.hackerforhireusa.com, http://www.GregoryDEvans.net, AmIHackerProof.com, http://ParentSecurityOnline.com, http://TheCyberWars.com, http://hiphopsecurity.com, http://HackerForHireinternational.com, http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://computer-security-expert.com

An intricate, two-year FBI Internet undercover operation that lured alleged cyber thieves to a fake Website netted two dozen arrests of hackers in eight countries in what the agency said is one of the largest coordinated international law enforcement actions in history directed at “carding” crimes.

The operation, said the FBI, potentially saved legitimate credit card customers over $200 million and protected over 400,000 potential victims.

“Carding” crimes traffic in and exploit stolen credit card, bank account and other personal identification information of hundreds of thousands of victims globally, said the FBI.

The agency’s sting Web site operated something like familiar legitimate auction sites, only selling malware and stolen credit card information and was populated by alleged criminals, according to the FBI. The range of nefarious products offered up for sale on the site not only included credit card information, but a range of malware that could be used in a wide range of illegal electronic activities. For instance, one seller, Michael Hogue, a/k/a “xVisceral,” allegedly offered remote access tools (RATs) that could be used to spy on computers and Web camera. It could be used to log a victim’s computer keyboard strokes to steal bank account access information and passwords.

Another man was accused of selling “fulls,” which is a full package of stolen personal identification and credit card information cardholder name, address, Social Security number, birth date, mother’s maiden name, and bank account information.

The coordinated action involving 13 countries, including the U.S., resulted in 24 arrests, including 11 people by U.S. federal and local authorities. Thirteen people in seven other countries were arrested by foreign law authorities.

In the U.S., authorities arrested Christian Cangeopol, a/k/a “404myth,” was arrested today in Lawrenceville, GA; Mark Caparelli, a/k/a “Cubby,” was arrested in San Diego; Sean Harper, a/k/a “Kabraxis314,” was arrested in Albuquerque, N.M; Alex Hatala, a/k/a “kool+kake,” was arrested in Jacksonville, FL; Joshua Hicks, a/k/a “OxideDox,” was arrested in Bronx, NY; Michael Hogue, a/k/a “xVisceral,” was arrested in Tucson, AZ; Mir Islam, a/k/a “JoshTheGod,” was arrested in Manhattan; Peter Ketchum, a/k/a “IwearaMAGNUM,” was arrested in Pittsfield, MA; Steven Hansen, a/k/a “theboner1,” was arrested in Wisconsin, where he is currently serving a prison sentence on state charges.

Two minors, whom the FBI didn’t name, were arrested in Long Beach and Sacramento, CA.

Internationally, arrests were made in Bosnia, Bulgaria, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, and the U.K., according to the FBI. Charges were also unsealed in New York against four additional defendants who remain at large.

“The allegations unsealed today chronicle a breathtaking spectrum of cyber schemes and scams,” said Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in a June 26 statement.  “As described in the charging documents, individuals sold credit cards by the thousands and took the private information of untold numbers of people. As alleged, the defendants casually offered every stripe of malware and virus to fellow fraudsters, even including software-enabling cyber voyeurs to hijack an unsuspecting consumer’s personal computer camera. To expose and prosecute individuals like the alleged cyber criminals charged today will continue to require exactly the kind of coordinated response and international cooperation that made today’s arrests possible.”

In June 2010, the FBI established an undercover carding forum called “Carder Profit” that allowed users to discuss carding crime and to communicate offers to buy, sell, and exchange goods and services related to carding, among other things. The FBI said the site offered a viable way into the world of carding since the people engaged in the activities were used to such sites. It said the site also offered a way to shield potential victims of the alleged crimes. The UC Site was configured to allow the FBI to monitor and to record the discussion threads posted to the site, as well as private messages sent through the site between registered users. The site also allowed the FBI to record the Internet protocol (IP) addresses of users’ computers when they accessed the site. The IP address is the unique number that identifies a computer on the Internet and allows information to be routed properly between computers.

Access to the UC Site, which was taken offline in May, was limited to registered members and required a username and password to gain entry, said the agency. Various membership requirements were imposed from time to time to restrict site membership to individuals with established knowledge of carding techniques or interest in criminal activity. For example, at times, new users were prevented from joining the site unless they were recommended by two existing users who had registered with the site or unless they paid a registration fee.

New users registering with the UC Site were required to provide a valid e-mail address as part of the registration process. The e-mail addresses entered by registered members of the site were collected by the FBI.

Those charged in the operation face between five and 20 years in prison if convicted, according to the FBI.
http://www.GregoryDEvans.com, http://www.Locatepc.net, http://stolencomputeralert.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://www.hackerforhireusa.com, http://www.GregoryDEvans.net, AmIHackerProof.com, http://ParentSecurityOnline.com, http://TheCyberWars.com, http://hiphopsecurity.com, http://HackerForHireinternational.com, http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://computer-security-expert.com

With the Olympics coming to London, there may be opportunities for criminals, hacktivists and mischief-makers to make a high profile attack against the event’s computer systems.

But what about your own computers, and your personal data and finances?

View full post on Naked Security – Sophos

Sites we like

Stolen Computer Alert
How to become the world’s No. 1 hacker
Gregory Evans is the World’s No. 1 Security Consutlant

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed’s books are currently distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company’s acquisition of VMWare. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

The massive Flashfake attack on thousands of Mac computers has formally exposed the vulnerability of Apple’s operating system.

Kaspersky Lab security expert Costin Raiu

Kaspersky Lab security expert Costin Raiu explained that in the next few months, similar attacks will likely occur which exploit two main things: outdated software and the user’s lack of awareness.

The Russia-based Internet security company, however, has created a list of tips that can help Mac users ensure that their devices remain secure.

“If you follow these steps, keep everything updated and be aware of these attacks, your chances of becoming yet another random victim will be greatly diminished,” Raiu reminded.

1. Create a non-admin account for everyday activities — create a non-admin user where you only log in as administrator when you need to perform administrative tasks. This greatly helps to limit the damage from zero-day threats and drive-by malware attacks.

2. Use a Web browser that contains a sandbox and has a solid track record of fixing security issues in a prompt manner — Google Chrome is updated more often than Apple’s built-in Safari browser. Google Chrome also comes with a sandboxed version of Flash Player that puts up a significant roadblock for malicious exploits. It has also a silent, automatic update mechanism that removes the burden of patching security vulnerabilities.

3. Uninstall the standalone Flash Player — Adobe’s Flash Player has been a common target for hackers as it allows them to take complete control over target computers. Removing it will significantly lessen security risks.

4. Solve the Java problem — Java is also a preferred target for exploit writers looking to plant malware on your machine. It is recommended to have it completely uninstalled.

5. Run “Software Update” and patch the machine promptly when updates are available — Many of the recent attacks against Mac OS X took advantage of old or outdated software. Commonly exploited suites include Microsoft Office, Adobe Reader/Acrobat, and Oracle’s Java. It is recommended to update to 2011 as soon as possible. Be sure to apply the fixes and reboot the machine when necessary.

6. Use a password manager to help cope with phishing attacks — Mac comes with a built-in password manager, the “Keychain,” which generates unique and strong passphrases for a device’s resources. Whenever the cyber-criminals manage to compromise one account, they will immediately try the same password everywhere — GMail, Facebook, eBay, PayPal and so on. Hence, having a unique strong password on each resource is a huge boost to your online security.

7. Disable IPv6, AirPort, and Bluetooth when not needed — Turn off connectivity services when not in use, or when not required. These include IPv6, AirPort and Bluetooth — three services that can be used as entry points for hacker attacks.

8. Enable full disk encryption (MacOS X 10.7+) or FileVault — In MacOS X Lion, Apple updated their encryption solution (FileVault) and added full disk encryption. Now known as “FileVault 2”, this has the advantage of securing the entire disk instead of just your home folder and can be very useful if your laptop gets stolen.

9. Upgrade Adobe Reader to version “10” or later — Adobe Reader is also a preferred target of cybercriminals. Version 10 includes numerous security enhancements which make it a lot safer than any previous versions.

10. Install a good security solution – It is no longer true that “Macs do not get viruses.” After six years, the situation has changed considerably. The Flashback trojan which appeared in September 2011 caused a huge outbreak in March 2012, which amounted for over half a million infected users worldwide. Thus, a security solution is absolutely required for any Mac user. One can easily download and install a trial of Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Mac.

Related Posts

Glenn Mangham, the Facebook hacker who stole the social network’s source code, has gone public with a deeper explanation of how he penetrated the website.

The 26-year-old student, of York, posted a lengthy writeup on his blog and a video, saying that he accepts full responsibility for his actions and that he did not think through the potential ramifications.

“Strictly speaking what I did broke the law because at the time and subsequently it was not authorised,” Mangham wrote. “I was working under the premise that sometimes it is better to seek forgiveness than to ask permission.”

Mangham implied he meant to contact Facebook once he had noticed the social networking site had observed his intrusions, which he did little to hide. He didn’t use proxy servers because he said it made auditing take longer due to the time delay between each request made to a server. He was also hoping that even when he got caught, Facebook would let him off the hook.

That didn’t happen. He was charged and eventually pleaded guilty to three counts of unauthorised access to computer material and unauthorised modification of computer data, according to The York Press.

Mangham was sentenced to eight months in prison in February, but the sentence was reduced to four months by an appeals court earlier this month. He was then eligible for release, subject to electronic monitoring and restrictions on his internet use.

Mangham used a vulnerability to download Facebook’s source code, arguably the company’s most valued and secret intellectual property.

Mangham portrayed himself as a security researcher who continued to probe Facebook because he wanted to look deeper for other security issues, since most systems have “a tough outer shell and a soft inside.” He wrote that in the past he had been paid by Yahoo for finding vulnerabilities.

He said he took steps to prevent damage to Facebook’s systems, hard-coding a delay in scripts he used to extract the source code to prevent “throttling of the server and impeding its availability.”

After he knew Facebook was on his trail, Mangham wrote he “panicked because I knew how bad it looked without sufficient context.” He maintained that “almost nobody” knew he had a copy of the site’s source code, and that he kept it “physically detached from the internet.”

“In many respects, it was better secured than the original,” Mangham wrote.

Mangham’s copy of the source code would surely have been of interest to cybercriminals who attempt to use Facebook to perpetuate scams. But he wrote he had no intention of selling the code.

“It is also worth mentioning that I had the source code for just over three weeks with absolutely nothing to prevent me from making copies and redistributing it, this was more than enough time to have caused significant damage to Facebook or to find a buyer, if that had ever actually been my intention but quite clearly it was not,” Mangham wrote.

“When you consider that the only thing that stood between Facebook and potential annihilation were my ethics then I think the fact that it’s all still in good working order should serve as some proof that I’m really not one of the bad guys,” he wrote.

The hacker who stole Facebook’s source code has gone public with a deeper explanation of how he penetrated the world’s most popular social network.

Glenn Mangham, of York, England, posted a lengthy writeup on his blog and a video, saying that he accepts full responsibility for his actions and that he did not think through the potential ramifications.

“Strictly speaking what I did broke the law because at the time and subsequently it was not authorized,” Mangham wrote. “I was working under the premise that sometimes it is better to seek forgiveness than to ask permission.”

Mangham implied he meant to contact Facebook once he had noticed the social-networking site had observed his intrusions, which he did little to hide. He didn’t use proxy servers because he said it made auditing take longer due to the time delay between each request made to a server. He was also hoping that even when he got caught, Facebook would let him off the hook.

That didn’t happen. He was charged and eventually pleaded guilty to three counts of unauthorized access to computer material and unauthorized modification of computer data, according to The Press newspaper in York.

Mangham was sentenced to eight months in prison in February, but the sentence was reduced to four months by an appeals court earlier this month. He was then eligible for release, subject to electronic monitoring and restrictions on his internet use.

Mangham used a vulnerability to download Facebook’s source code, arguably the company’s most valued and secret intellectual property.

Mangham portrayed himself as a security researcher who continued to probe Facebook because he wanted to look deeper for other security issues, since most systems have “a tough outer shell and a soft inside.” He wrote that in the past he had been paid by Yahoo for finding vulnerabilities.

He said he took steps to prevent damage to Facebook’s systems, hard-coding a delay in scripts he used to extract the source code to prevent “throttling of the server and impeding its availability.”

After he knew Facebook was on his trail, Mangham wrote he “panicked because I knew how bad it looked without sufficient context.” He maintained that “almost nobody” knew he had a copy of the site’s source code, and that he kept it “physically detached from the internet.”

“In many respects, it was better secured than the original,” Mangham wrote.

Mangham’s copy of the source code would surely have been of interest to cybercriminals who attempt to use Facebook to perpetuate scams. But he wrote he had no intention of selling the code.

“It is also worth mentioning that I had the source code for just over three weeks with absolutely nothing to prevent me from making copies and redistributing it, this was more than enough time to have caused significant damage to Facebook or to find a buyer, if that had ever actually been my intention but quite clearly it was not,” Mangham wrote.

“When you consider that the only thing that stood between Facebook and potential annihilation were my ethics then I think the fact that it’s all still in good working order should serve as some proof that I’m really not one of the bad guys,” he wrote.

Send news tips and comments to jeremy_kirk@idg.com

Join the mailing list

Check your email and confirm the subscription

%d bloggers like this: