View full post on Tenable Network Security Blog
Hacking Tools Archive
Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 160 – “RSA Roundup, Vulnerability Disclosure Game Changer”
Posted March 6, 2013 ByWe have Microsoft Tuesday, so how long until we have Indicator Wednesday?
Posted February 27, 2013 ByView full post on Tenable Network Security Blog
http://ParentSecurityOnline.com, http://computer-security-expert.com, http://HackerForHireinternational.com, http://stolencomputeralert.com
Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 158 – “Microsoft, VMware, & Adobe Vulnerabilities! Oh, My!”
Posted February 20, 2013 ByView full post on Tenable Network Security Blog
U.S. Navy sees 110K Cyber Attacks Every Hour: Tenable Network Security’s take on White House EO on Cybersecurity
Posted February 18, 2013 ByAccording to a recent report, the U.S. Navy sees 110,000 cyber attacks every hour. In October, the world’s largest Internet search and advertising service warned thousands of users to beware of state-sponsored attacks.
View full post on Tenable Network Security Blog
AmIHackerProof.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://TheCyberWars.com
Tenable Network Security Podcast 157 – “Apple TV, Samba Vulnerabilities”
Posted February 18, 2013 ByAnnouncements
- Patch management in a world of IPv6 IT resources
- We’re hiring! – Visit the Tenable website for more information about open positions.
View full post on Tenable Network Security Blog
Auditing Microsoft Office Configurations Using Nessus
Posted February 8, 2013 ByView full post on Tenable Network Security Blog
AmIHackerProof.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://TheCyberWars.com
SecurityCenter 4.6.2 Provides Enhanced CyberScope Monitoring and Reporting
Posted February 7, 2013 ByView full post on Tenable Network Security Blog
http://www.Locatepc.net, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://stolencomputeralert.com, http://www.computersecurityguru.com
New Nessus Plugins Audit Your Patch Management System Effectiveness
Posted January 30, 2013 ByIntegrating with Patch Management
In December 2011, Tenable announced that Nessus could integrate with many popular patch management solutions. Initial support was offered for Red Hat Network Satellite server, Microsoft WSUS / SCCM, and VMware Go. More recently, support was added for IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (TEM) for Patch Management. Integration with patch management solutions means Nessus and SecurityCenter can collect information about patches from systems without requiring credentials to the targeted hosts themselves.
Today, two new plugins extend our previous integration to automatically cross-reference vulnerabilities from credentialed patch audits with patch information from your patch management solution, reporting discrepancies in a single report.
This video explains how Nessus integrates with your patch management solutions, including some of the problems it will uncover, benefits of integration, and a quick demonstration.
Nessus vs. Patch Management Solutions
Two new Nessus plugins, titled Patch Management Windows Auditing Conflicts and Patch Management Auditing Satisfied, are now available to compare Windows patch auditing results. Nessus compares the patch data it finds on the target with results from patch management solutions. In addition, Nessus can also compare results from an organization’s different patch management solutions. For example, if you provided credentials for the target hosts themselves and Microsoft SCCM, Microsoft WSUS, and IBM TEM, Nessus will produce the following report:
The above results come from the Patch Management Windows Auditing Conflicts plugin and detail the discrepancies between Nessus and patch management solutions results.
As we’ve established (see the previous post “If a Security Control Falls in the Forest…“), patches can fall off a system for a variety of reasons. This underscores the importance of cross-referencing patches between what is on the system and what the patch management solution thinks is on the system. In the above Nessus output, you can see that Nessus had credentials to login to the target system itself (indicated by the “Nessus ->”). Nessus was also able to pull the patch levels from SCCM (as indicated by the “-> SCCM conflicts”). What follows is a report for each patch and the discrepancies. As the first entry indicates for the host, Nessus found MS11-049 missing, but IBM TEM is reporting that patch as being applied.
Administrators can view more details by reviewing the results for each missing patch. Nessus will display the file and/or registry key that was used to validate the installation of the patch. This can be used to quickly identify the gaps in your patching processes.
Often, security professionals run into the problem of conflicting patch audits. The systems administrators sometimes dispute the results of the vulnerability scan, causing potential exposures to linger in your environment. With this new functionality, you will have the information to work with your systems administrators to work out the gaps in your patch management processes, and more quickly and easily resolve problems.
Conclusion
One of the concepts that sticks out in my mind, mentioned by Gene Kim in our interview, was “trust but verify.” This new plugin allows you to do just that. It’s critical to the success of your IT organization to implement a well thought-out patch management strategy. However, how do you know if it’s functioning properly and there are no gaps? By using Nessus and SecurityCenter you can keep tabs on the overall health of your systems, processes, and procedures on a continual basis and make adjustments as you go. Nessus also has the ability to perform configuration auditing against IBM TEM servers and clients, including checks for software versions, service status, and file permissions. The PVS (Passive Vulnerability Scanner) can further monitor patch management systems and detect vulnerabilities in real time over the network. This level of continuous monitoring will allow you to constantly measure the integrity of the systems in your environment and take corrective actions when necessary.
View full post on Tenable Network Security
http://www.Locatepc.net, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://stolencomputeralert.com, http://www.computersecurityguru.com
Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 155 – “Patch Management Conflict Auditing”
Posted January 30, 2013 ByAnnouncements
- Video: Nessus Patch Management Integration
- Video: Introduction to the Nessus Vulnerability Scanner
- Check out our video channel on YouTube which contains new Nessus and SecurityCenter tutorials.
- We’re hiring! – Visit the Tenable website for more information about open positions.
- Tenable Tweets – You can find us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/tenablesecurity where we make product and company announcements, provide Nessus plugin statistics, and more!
- Want to ask questions about Nessus, SecurityCenter, LCE, and PVS and get answers from the experts at Tenable? Join Tenable’s Discussion Forum for custom scripts, announcements, and more!
- You can subscribe to the Tenable Network Security Podcast on iTunes!
New & Notable Plugins
Nessus
Web Application-related Plugins:
- Horde IMP js/compose-dimp.js XSS
- MoinMoin twikidraw.py Traversal File Upload Arbitrary File Overwrite
- Adobe ColdFusion Unspecified DoS (APSB12-21) (credentialed check)
- Adobe ColdFusion Unspecified Sandbox Bypass (APSB12-26) (credentialed check)
- Drupal 6.x < 6.28 / 7.x < 7.19 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Floating Social Media Links Plugin for WordPress wpp Parameter Remote File Inclusion
- WebYaST Host Modification MiTM
- Portable phpMyAdmin Plugin for WordPress wp-pma-mod Authentication Bypass
- Adobe ColdFusion 10 on IIS Unspecified DoS (APSB12-25) (credentialed check)
- Browser Rejector Plugin for WordPress wppath Parameter Remote File Inclusion
- Forums Plugin for WordPress url Parameter Arbitrary File Disclosure
- Google Doc Embedder Plugin for WordPress File Parameter Traversal Arbitrary File Disclosure
Various Plugins:
- Apache CouchDB < 1.0.4 / 1.1.2 / 1.2.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- MS13-006: Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Could Allow Security Feature Bypass (2785220) (uncredentialed check)
- Cisco ASA 1000V H.323 Inspection DoS
- Google Chrome < 24.0.1312.56 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Samsung Kies SyncService ActiveX PrepareSync() Buffer Overflow
- NetIQ Privileged User Manager regclnt.dll Directory Traversal
Virtualization Plugins:
- Oracle VM VirtualBox Core Subcomponent < 4.0.18 / 4.1.24 / 4.2.6 Local Issue
- VMware View Server Unsupported Version Detection
- VMware View Multiple Vulnerabilities (VMSA-2012-0004)
- VMware View Server Directory Traversal Vulnerability (VMSA-2012-0017)
Passive Vulnerability Scanner
- PHP 5.3.x < 5.3.21 cuRL X.509 Certificate Domain Name Matching MiTM Weakness
- PHP 5.4.x < 5.4.11 cURL X.509 Certificate Domain Name Matching MiTM Weakness
- Google Chrome < 24.0.1312.56 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- MySQL Server 5.1.x < 5.1.67 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- MySQL Server 5.5.x < 5.5.29 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Windows 8 App Store Access
- Windows 8 App Store Download Detected
- Windows 8 Tile Services Detection
Nessus Configuration and Compliance Checks
Nessus ProfessionalFeed and SecurityCenter customers can download compliance checks from the Tenable Support Portal.
- Tivoli Enterprise Manager Server and Client Audits – These audit files verify most of the recommended settings that should be reviewed on a TEM Server, Relay Server, or Client install. They include checks for versions, required service status, directory paths, and URLs. Other checks verify the configuration for users, password parameters, the TEM required services, and file permissions. Where appropriate, the checks have the ability to be customized to the specific requirements of the local environment.
Stories
- PSA: Don’t upload your important passwords to GitHub | Ars Technica
- Scripts and Picks: Command Execution on Shoretel Mobility Router
- RaiderSec: Wireless “Deauth” Attack using Aireplay-ng, Python, and Scapy
- Hackers drop rogue Apache modules and SSH backdoors on web servers
- Anons hack Asteroids into US DoJ website in Swartz death protest
- ‘Cyber 9/11′ may be on horizon, Homeland Security chief warns
- Oracle will continue to bundle ‘crapware’ with Java
- Avoid the Landmine That is Hacking Back
View full post on Tenable Network Security
Auditing the Effectiveness of Your Patch Management System with Nessus
Posted January 30, 2013 ByIntegrating with Patch Management
In December 2011, Tenable announced that Nessus could integrate with many popular patch management solutions. Initial support was offered for Red Hat Network Satellite server, Microsoft WSUS / SCCM, and VMware Go. More recently, support was added for IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (TEM) for Patch Management.
Integration with patch management solutions means Nessus and SecurityCenter can collect information about patches from systems without requiring credentials to the targeted hosts themselves. Instead, one set of credentials is used for your patch management solution to pull information about patches for the specified targets. Until now, Nessus would favor individual credentials to the target, then fall back to the patch management solution(s) if credentials failed (or were not provided for the target). However, with this new update, Nessus will automatically cross-reference vulnerabilities from credentialed patch audits with patch information from your patch management solution, reporting discrepancies in a single report.
This video explains how Nessus integrates with your patch management solutions, including some of the problems it will uncover, benefits of integration, and a quick demonstration.
Nessus vs. Patch Management Solutions
A recent update, in the form a new Nessus plugin titled Patch Management Windows Auditing Conflicts, was added to compare Windows patch auditing results. Nessus compares the patch data it finds on the target with results from patch management solutions. In addition, Nessus can also compare results from an organization’s different patch management solutions. For example, if you provided credentials for the target hosts themselves and Microsoft SCCM, Microsoft WSUS, and IBM TEM, Nessus will produce the following report:
The above results come from the Patch Management Windows Auditing Conflicts plugin and detail the discrepancies between Nessus and patch management solutions results.
As we’ve established (see the previous post “If a Security Control Falls in the Forest…“), patches can fall off a system for a variety of reasons. This underscores the importance of cross-referencing patches between what is on the system and what the patch management solution thinks is on the system. In the above Nessus output, you can see that Nessus had credentials to login to the target system itself (indicated by the “Nessus ->”). Nessus was also able to pull the patch levels from SCCM (as indicated by the “-> SCCM conflicts”). What follows is a report for each patch and the discrepancies. As the first entry indicates for the host, Nessus found MS11-049 missing, but IBM TEM is reporting that patch as being applied.
Administrators can view more details by reviewing the results for each missing patch. Nessus will display the file and/or registry key that was used to validate the installation of the patch. This can be used to quickly identify the gaps in your patching processes.
Often, security professionals run into the problem of conflicting patch audits. The systems administrators sometimes dispute the results of the vulnerability scan, causing potential exposures to linger in your environment. With this new functionality, you will have the information to work with your systems administrators to work out the gaps in your patch management processes, and more quickly and easily resolve problems.
Conclusion
One of the concepts that sticks out in my mind, mentioned by Gene Kim in our interview, was “trust but verify.” This new plugin allows you to do just that. It’s critical to the success of your IT organization to implement a well thought-out patch management strategy. However, how do you know if it’s functioning properly and there are no gaps? By using Nessus and SecurityCenter you can keep tabs on the overall health of your systems, processes, and procedures on a continual basis and make adjustments as you go. Nessus also has the ability to perform configuration auditing against IBM TEM servers and clients, including checks for software versions, service status, and file permissions. The PVS (Passive Vulnerability Scanner) can further monitor patch management systems and detect vulnerabilities in real time over the network. This level of continuous monitoring will allow you to constantly measure the integrity of the systems in your environment and take corrective actions when necessary.
View full post on Tenable Network Security
AmIHackerProof.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net, http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://TheCyberWars.com
Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 154 – “Mozilla Patch Updates, Upgrade to the Latest Version (or Not)”
Posted January 24, 2013 ByWelcome to the Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 154
Announcements
- We’re hiring! – Recently, Business Insider named Tenable one of the 15 Most Important Security Startups of 2013. Visit the Tenable website for more information about open positions.
- Check out our video channel on YouTube which contains new Nessus and SecurityCenter tutorials.
- Tenable Tweets – You can find us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/tenablesecurity where we make product and company announcements, provide Nessus plugin statistics, and more!
- Want to ask questions about Nessus, SecurityCenter, LCE, and PVS and get answers from the experts at Tenable? Join Tenable’s Discussion Forum for custom scripts, announcements, and more!
- You can subscribe to the Tenable Network Security Podcast on iTunes!
New & Notable Plugins
Nessus
- Firefox 10.x < 10.0.12 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Firefox 10.x < 10.0.12 Multiple Vulnerabilities (Mac OS X)
- Firefox 17.x < 17.0.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Firefox 17.x < 17.0.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities (Mac OS X)
- Firefox 17.x < 17.0.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Firefox 17.x < 17.0.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities (Mac OS X)
- Firefox 17.x Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Firefox 17.x Multiple Vulnerabilities (Mac OS X)
- Mozilla Thunderbird 10.x < 10.0.12 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Mozilla Thunderbird 17.x < 17.0.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- SeaMonkey 2.14.x Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Thunderbird 10.x < 10.0.12 Multiple Vulnerabilities (Mac OS X)
- Thunderbird 17.x < 17.0.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities (Mac OS X)
- Cerberus FTP Server < 5.0.4.0 SSH DES Cipher Weakness
- Cerberus FTP Server < 5.0.5.0 Cross-Site Request Forgery
- Cerberus FTP Server < 5.0.6.0 Multiple XSS
- Samba 4.x < 4.0.1 AD DC LDAP Directory Objects Security Bypass
- Nagios Core history.cgi Multiple Parameter Buffer Overflow
- MySQL 5.5 < 5.5.29 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Windows OS Partial Product Key (WMI)
- Windows Product Key Retrieval
- PHP 5.3.x < 5.3.21 cURL X.509 Certificate Domain Name Matching MiTM Weakness
- PHP 5.4.x < 5.4.11 cURL X.509 Certificate Domain Name Matching MiTM Weakness
- Oracle Database, January 2013 Critical Patch Update
Passive Vulnerability Scanner
- Mozilla Firefox 17.x <= 17 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.x <= 2.14 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Mozilla Thunderbird 17.x < 17.0.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities
SecurityCenter Dashboards
- PCI Configuration Settings
- 800-53 Configuration Auditing
- DISA Control Correlation Identifier (CCI) Dashboard
SecurityCenter Report Templates
Stories
- Exploiting printers via Jetdirect vulnerabilities | viaForensics
- Is Dell looking to kill PCs with "Project Ophelia"?
- Canadian Student Expelled After Finding Critical Flaw in Software Used by Colleges
- What’s lurking in your network? Find out by decrypting SSL
- Bad parking job? Text the driver through the license plate
- Linksys vuln: Cisco responds
- ‘End of passwords’ predictions are premature – Cambridge boffin
View full post on Tenable Network Security
http://www.computersecurityguru.com, http://HackerForHireinternational.com, http://www.GregoryDEvans.net, http://hiphopsecurity.com
Using Nessus to Audit Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Configurations
Posted January 23, 2013 ByTrust, but Verify
Recently, Tenable added audit files for Nessus ProfessionalFeed users allowing them to audit Microsoft SharePoint server configurations. The audit policy uses both operating system and database information from a SharePoint server farm and compares it against the settings specified in the DISA STIG guide for Microsoft SharePoint 2010 servers. This blog entry discusses some of the Nessus functionality that was used to create the audit file.
Poll the typical office about what functionality SharePoint delivers, and the responses tend to be quite varied. Often, SharePoint first appears in an environment as a feature-rich version of the venerable file share. Beyond storing, tracking, and securing documents, more recent versions have added and expanded the suite of collaboration and socialization tools. Many locations have begun to take advantage of the built-in discussion forums, knowledge base, and team or personal blogs. The net result is that more and more of an organization’s institutional knowledge and workflow can be routed or accessed through web interfaces or the SharePoint integration found in most Microsoft Office tools.
Additions to SharePoint 2010
SharePoint 2010 was a major upgrade over the previous 2007 version. Without a doubt, the biggest addition was the integration of PowerShell support and “Cmdlets” specific to SharePoint. Cmdlets offer powerful one-line commands that can be used by themselves or combined to accomplish very complex tasks. While the familiar STSADM.exe tools are still available, the power of running a quick one-liner on the command line or building out a complex script to fully automate an entire farm installation using PowerShell is quite compelling. Very little, if any, of the day-to-day administration of SharePoint isn’t possible completely through PowerShell. Microsoft’s TechNet provides several example PowerShell scripts (even if your PowerShell skills are limited, you can likely find a complete solution, or at worst a starting point for your own modifications).
Nessus provides a robust PowerShell audit check that was discussed here. Anyone not familiar with PowerShell in Nessus should review that post to get a basic understanding of how the fundamentals work. A PowerShell check in Nessus using the standard built-in Cmdlets will generally look similar to this example which checks to see if a Hotfix is installed on the target:
<custom_item>
Type : AUDIT_POWERSHELL
Description : "Show Installed Hotfix"
value_type : POLICY_TEXT
value_data : ""
powershell_args: "Get-Hotfix | Where-Object {$_.Description –ne ''} | Select HotFixID | Format-List"
only_show_cmd_output: YES severity : LOW
</custom_item>
The Get-Hotfix, Where-Object, Select, and Format-List items are standard Cmdlets available simply by having PowerShell installed. One of the first things you’ll notice is that the check format returns an error if you attempt to use any of the specific SharePoint Cmdlets. In order to get to the Cmdlets we’re interested in we need to point the check at the SharePoint console file so Nessus can take advantage of the extended Cmdlets. As a result, a typical SharePoint check adds an additional parameter called powershell_console_file. This additional parameter is also used for most of the PowerShell checks in the Exchange Server audit.
A SharePoint (or Exchange Server) PowerShell check will look something like this:
<custom_item> Type : AUDIT_POWERSHELL Description : "Verify Site Collection Administrators'" value_type : POLICY_TEXT powershell_console_file: "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\CONFIG\POWERSHELL\Registration \psconsole.psc1" powershell_args : "Get-SPSite | select RootWeb,Url,Owner | Format-List" value_data : "" only_show_cmd_output: YES </custom_item>
SharePoint’s Default Ports
During installation, SharePoint chooses a random port and establishes that for the Central Administration link. While this does provide a small level of security by avoiding a known port for automated tools to target, it also makes it more difficult for crafting firewall or IDS rules to limit access to the Central Administration link. Nessus can query SharePoint servers and return the current Central Administration port. This allows administrators to document a known port for limiting access and validate that this configuration is maintained:
<custom_item>
Type : AUDIT_POWERSHELL
Description : " Central Administration port “
value_type : POLICY_TEXT
powershell_console_file: "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\CONFIG\POWERSHELL\Registration\psconsole.psc1"
powershell_args: 'Get-SPWebApplication -includecentraladministration | where {$_.IsAdministrationWebApplication} | Get-SPSite -identity {$_.Url} | select Port | Format-List'
value_data : "" only_show_cmd_output: YES </custom_item>
This check can be used as-is to return the current port into the Nessus results. If a particular port value is documented and expected to be in use, the value_data could be modified to validate that specific custom value.
<custom_item>
Type : AUDIT_POWERSHELL Description : " Central Administration port “ value_type : POLICY_TEXT
powershell_console_file: "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\CONFIG\POWERSHELL\Registration \psconsole.psc1"
?powershell_args : 'Get-SPWebApplication -includecentraladministration | where {$_.IsAdministrationWebApplication} | Get-SPSite -identity {$_.Url} | select Port | Format-List'
value_data : "" </custom_item>
SharePoint and Anti-malware
Since file storage and sharing are so fundamental to SharePoint, making sure that files are clean entering and leaving SharePoint helps to protect any clients whose local anti-virus facilities aren’t up to date or functioning properly. Several products exist in the market specifically targeted at supporting anti-malware scanning on a SharePoint farm. Regardless of the specific product deployed, validating that SharePoint is actually scanning can be determined for both uploads and downloads.
Checking for scanning enabled on upload takes a slightly different path as it begins by leveraging a class directly rather than a Cmdlet:
<custom_item>
Type : AUDIT_POWERSHELL
Description : "'Scan Documents on Upload is enabled"
value_type : POLICY_TEXT
powershell_console_file: "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\CONFIG\POWERSHELL\Registration\psconsole.psc1"
powershell_args: '[Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPWebService]::ContentService
?
| select -ExpandProperty AntivirusSettings | Where-Object {$_.UploadScanEnabled -ne 1} | Format-List'
value_data : ""
powershell_option: CAN_BE_NULL </custom_item>
SharePoint Web Applications
Tailoring SharePoint web applications and their application pools allow you to more efficiently utilize system memory. Running unnecessary application pools could result in significant overhead as each pool uses, at minimum, 100MB of memory even before it starts any caching. However, keeping internal and external or authenticated vs. anonymous content separated is a very basic security practice. Tracking the current allocation of web applications to application pools becomes a very simple check using the PowerShell Cmdlets.
<custom_item> Type : AUDIT_POWERSHELL description : "Show App Pool Assigned to Web Application" value_type : POLICY_TEXT powershell_console_file: "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\CONFIG\POWERSHELL\Registration\psconsole.psc1" powershell_args: 'Get-SPWebApplication | select ApplicationPool | Format- List' value_data : "" only_show_cmd_output: YES </custom_item>
This check could also be refined to directly return the application pool used by a specific web application like Central Administration:
<custom_item>
Type : AUDIT_POWERSHELL
description : "Show App Pool Assigned to Central Administration"
value_type : POLICY_TEXT
powershell_console_file: "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\CONFIG\POWERSHELL\Registration\psconsole.psc1"
powershell_args: 'Get-SPWebApplication |
Where-Object {$_.ApplicationPool -eq $(Get-
SPWebApplication –IncludeCentralAdministration |
Where-Object {$_.IsAdministrationWebApplication} | select ApplicationPool).ApplicationPool} | select DisplayName,ApplicationPool | Format-List'
value_data : "" only_show_cmd_output: YES </custom_item>
In addition, a final refinement of this check could be used to validate that the Central Administration site is using the specific application pool defined by local security policy:
<custom_item>
Type : AUDIT_POWERSHELL
description : "Show App Pool Assigned to Central Administration" value_type : POLICY_TEXT
powershell_console_file: "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\CONFIG\POWERSHELL\Registration\psconsole.psc1"
powershell_args: 'Get-SPWebApplication |
Where-Object {$_.ApplicationPool -eq $(Get- SPWebApplication –IncludeCentralAdministration |
Where-Object {$_.IsAdministrationWebApplication} | select ApplicationPool).ApplicationPool} | select ApplicationPool | Format-List'
value_data : "" </custom_item>
General SharePoint Auditing Features
In addition to the examples above, this audit file contains more than 70 checks to validate a host for common configuration details including many of the most frequent pitfalls.
- Session timeouts
- Security attributes
- IRM settings
- Access and authorization
- SharePoint services
- Auditing
Many of the checks in the audits are specifically written with local customizations in mind so that values for users, groups, and remote services can be easily integrated into the audit allowing customized results. This audit can be used as is or as a basis for further customization based on the specific needs of the organization.
Further Reading
If you want to dig deeper into the benefits and value of configuration auditing, please refer to our interview with Gene Kim. We discuss with Gene what makes a great IT organization and how configuration auditing can be used effectively.
*Originally written by Justin Brown, Tenable Compliance Auditor
View full post on Tenable Network Security
http://TheCyberWars.com, http://www.GregoryDEvans.net, http://computer-security-expert.com, http://www.hackerforhireusa.com
Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 153 – “Java, Adobe, and Microsoft IE Vulnerabilities”
Posted January 15, 2013 ByWelcome to the Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 153
Announcements
- Tenable Network Security: Windows and OS X SSID Reporting and…
- Tracking Wireless SSIDs Using Nessus
- Tenable Named One of the Coolest Startups
- We’re hiring! – Visit the Tenable website for more information about open positions.
- Check out our video channel on YouTube which contains new Nessus and SecurityCenter tutorials.
- Tenable Tweets – You can find us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/tenablesecurity where we make product and company announcements, provide Nessus plugin statistics, and more!
- Want to ask questions about Nessus, SecurityCenter, LCE, and PVS and get answers from the experts at Tenable? Join Tenable’s Discussion Forum for custom scripts, announcements, and more!
- You can subscribe to the Tenable Network Security Podcast on iTunes!
New & Notable Plugins
Nessus
- VLC Media Player < 2.0.5 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Juniper Junos J-Web URL Encoding Heap Buffer Overflow (PSN-2013-01-807)
- Juniper Junos PIM Join Flood DoS (PSN-2013-01-808)
- Oracle Java SE 7 < Update 11 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- MS13-008: Security Update for Internet Explorer (2799329)
- NVIDIA Display Driver Service Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (credentialed check)
- MS KB2796096: Update for Vulnerabilities in Adobe Flash Player in Internet Explorer 10
- Adobe Acrobat < 11.0.1 / 10.1.5 / 9.5.3 Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB13-02)
- Adobe AIR 3.x <= 3.5.0.880 Buffer Overflow (APSB13-01)
- Adobe AIR for Mac 3.x <= 3.5.0.890 Buffer Overflow (APSB13-01)
- Adobe Reader < 11.0.1 / 10.1.5 / 9.5.3 Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB13-02)
- Adobe Reader < 11.0.1 / 10.1.5 / 9.5.3 Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB13-02) (Mac OS X)
- Flash Player <= 10.3.183.48 / 11.5.502.135 Buffer Overflow (APSB13-01)
- Flash Player for Mac <= 10.3.183.48 / 11.5.502.136 Buffer Overflow (APSB13-01)
Passive Vulnerability Scanner
- Google Chrome < 24.0.1312.52 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Oracle Java SE 7 <= Update 10 Remote Code Execution
- Flash Player <= 10.3.183.48 / 11.5.502.135 Buffer Overflow (APSB13-01)
Stories
- Happy Out of Cycle IE Patch Monday
- AV “Really” Dead Now Says Security Expert
- All Your Base Are In An Indeterminate State | Dark Reading
- Homeland Security still advises disabling Java, even after update
- Remote zero-day hole found in Linksys routers | Networking – Technology – News – iTnews.com.au
- Hackers claim new air traffic system can be hijacked | RT
View full post on Tenable Network Security
Tracking Wireless SSIDs Using Nessus
Posted January 14, 2013 ByNessus has plugins that can pull out current (or previously used) wireless service set identifiers (WiFi SSIDs) that Windows and OS X systems have connected to in the past. The following plugins are used:
- Mac OS X Wireless Networks List (63340) – This new plugin reports a history of wireless networks used by the target system.
- Windows Wireless SSID (WMI) (25197) – Using WMI, this plugin reports the existing wireless network the target host is currently using.
For both of the above checks, you must enter valid system credentials for the target hosts. Below is a sample report from an OS X system:
A listing of previous wireless networks to which a Mac OS X host has connected.
The plugins mentioned above are useful in the following scenarios:
- If a Windows computer is connected to the internal wired network, you can easily identify hosts that may have also accidentally (or intentionally) connected to unsupported wireless networks (such as the coffee shop next door).
- The history of wireless networks for OS X hosts can indicate where the particular host has visited. For example, bars, restaurants, and airports often have an SSID that identifies the location.
- The name of the wireless network itself can sometimes indicate the security level. For example, if you find hosts that have connected to an SSID of “Linksys,” you can be fairly certain they were using a wireless network without encryption. Since “link sys” is the default SSID for several different wireless routers, users who have left the default SSID rarely will configure the router to support encryption.
- If an attacker presented a wireless network to your users and used it to attack systems, you can see which Windows hosts are currently connected to it and which OS X systems may have connected to it in the past.
View full post on Tenable Network Security
http://www.hackerforhireusa.com, http://computer-security-expert.com, AmIHackerProof.com, http://computersecurityexpert.net
Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 152 – “WiFi Network History, Self-policing Code”
Posted January 9, 2013 ByWelcome to the Tenable Network Security Podcast Episode 152
Announcements
- We’re hiring! – Visit the Tenable website for more information about open positions.
- Check out our video channel on YouTube which contains new Nessus and SecurityCenter tutorials.
- Tenable Tweets – You can find us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/tenablesecurity where we make product and company announcements, provide Nessus plugin statistics, and more!
- Want to ask questions about Nessus, SecurityCenter, LCE, and PVS and get answers from the experts at Tenable? Join Tenable’s Discussion Forum for custom scripts, announcements, and more!
- You can subscribe to the Tenable Network Security Podcast on iTunes!
New & Notable Plugins
Nessus
- Squid 2.x / 3.x < 3.1.22 / 3.2.4 / 3.3.0.2 cachemgr.cgi DoS
- Advanced Custom Fields Plugin for WordPress acf_abspath Parameter Remote File Inclusion
- Citrix XenDesktop Virtual Desktop Agent USB Redirection Propagation Handling Access Restriction Bypass (CTX135813)
- Drupal 6.x < 6.27 / 7.x < 7.18 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.1.x < 7.1.2.9 Multiple Vulnerabilities (credentialed check)
- VMSA-2012-0018 : VMware security updates for vCSA and ESXi
- Snare Agent for Linux > 1.7.0 / 2.0.0 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Novell iPrint Client < 5.82 Remote Code Execution
- Novell eDirectory 8.8.x Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
- Citrix XenApp XML Service Interface Crafted Packet Parsing Remote Code Execution (CTX135066)
- Mac OS X Wireless Networks List
- PostgreSQL 8.3 < 8.3.18 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- MS KB2794220: Vulnerability in Internet Explorer Could Allow Remote Code Execution
- MS KB2798897: Unauthorized Digital Certificates Could Allow Spoofing
- VLC < 2.0.5 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- SSL Certificate Chain Contains Illegitimate TURKTRUST Intermediate CA
Passive Vulnerability Scanner
- Flash Player <= 10.3.183.43 / 11.5.502.110 Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB12-27)
- iPhone App Install Detected
- Opera < 12.12 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Netsuite Client Detection
- Instagram Upload Activity Detected
- Real Networks RealPlayer < 16.0.0.282 Multiple Vulnerabilities
- Flash Player <= 10.3.183.29 / 11.4.402.287 Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB12-24)
- MySQL Server 5.1 < 5.1.63 Multiple Vulnerabilities
Stories
- Does Your Alarm Have a Default Duress Code?
- Pointless observation on snow removal and InfoSec
- Biggest Problem in Computer Security | ITauditSecurity
- Top email terms used by corporate fraudsters published by FBI
- Researcher sidesteps Microsoft fix for IE zero-day
- Silent Skype calls can hide secret messages
- Why Hackers Are So Much Funnier Than You Are
View full post on Tenable Network Security
http://www.hackerforhireusa.com, http://computer-security-expert.com, http://www.GregoryDEvans.com, http://www.Locatepc.net
