Arabic Arabic Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified) Dutch Dutch English English French French German German Italian Italian Portuguese Portuguese Russian Russian Spanish Spanish
| (844) 627-8267

Associate sues managing partner for hacking her WhatsApp account | #hacking | #cybersecurity | #infosec | #comptia | #pentest | #hacker


Airplane 650

How the firm enjoyed disclosure (allegedly).


A junior solicitor is suing the owner of a law firm for allegedly hacking into her WhatsApp account, disclosing private messages “of the most intimate kind” to a tribunal.

The unnamed junior (referred to in a High Court judgment as FKJ) started work for a managing partner (referred to as RVT) of two connected law firms in February 2017. However, she was fired that year for falsifying a timesheet.

In 2019 FKJ lost an employment tribunal claim for wrongful dismissal and sexual discrimination. She claimed that RVT had sexually harassed her,  with his actions ranging from “inappropriate remarks to sexual touching.”

FKJ’s own WhatsApp messages were used as evidence against her at the tribunal hearing. In dismissing FKJ’s claim, the panel at the time said that the messages “played a large part” in their findings to undermine the junior lawyer’s credibility, and demonstrated that some of the conduct, of which she complained, was consensual, or did not happen.

The junior lawyer then commenced a claim of misuse of private information. RVT applied for summary judgment, and brought a counterclaim for abuse of process. At a High Court hearing last month, Master Davison considered the application to strike out FKJ’s claim.

The court heard that the employment tribunal’s bundle in 2019, consisted of some 18,000 WhatsApp messages (around 900 pages). It captured several years’ worth of day-to-day information about the junior lawyer’s professional, social and private life, including her health and sex life.

Some of the messages and images disclosed by the defence, were of the “most intimate kind” to FKJ’s partner.

Master Davison said the bulk of messages had “no relevance” to the proceedings, and there was therefore “no justification” that they had been retained.

FKJ alleges that the managing partner, RVT, hacked into her WhatsApp messages by setting up the computer-based “WhatsApp Web” and using her smartphone to scan the QR code generated, as authorisation. He was therefore able to capture the entirety of FKJ’s available WhatsApp messages.

However, RVT said that a “substantial quantity” of the messages were discovered on FKJ’s work laptop after she left the firm. He also stated that two further tranches of messages were sent in by letters from an “anonymous source”.

Master Davison said that he found it “hard to agree” with RVT’s submission that FKJ’s claim “will face significant problems.” Davison’s “overall impression” was that RVT’s counterclaim was “without merit” and was an “attempt to stifle a claim that the defendants would prefer not to contest on its merits.”

The High Court therefore rejected RVT’s application for summary judgment, giving FKJ the green light to pursue her claim for misuse of private information.


lu logo

Whether you’re just curious or ready for your next career move, LawyerUp means you’ll never miss approaches from top employers who want you. Free and available now on the App Store and Google Play.


——————————————————–


Click Here For The Original Story From This Source.

National Cyber Security

FREE
VIEW