Police Sargent van Buren used a police car computer to access the Georgia vehicle license database to find information about the owner associated with a particular license plate number. He took this action in exchange for a $ 5,000 bribe. Unfortunately, Van Buren was involved in an FBI sting operation and was charged with a felony under the Federal Bureau of Investigation (CFAA). After a jury trial, he was convicted and sentenced to 18 months in prison. With this seemingly routine fact pattern, the Supreme Court examined the scope of the CFAA to resolve contradictory interpretations between federal circuit courts. Van Buren vs. United States, 141 S.Ct. 1648 (2021). The question was whether Van Buren exceeded the “permitted access” defined in the CFAA. In a 6 to 3 split decision between judges, Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s opinion was that the CFAA misuses computerized information if the indicted person is granted access to the data in question. I found that it did not cover.
In the early days of the computer era, in the early 1980s, misuse of computers and information stored on them exposed holes in federal criminal law. Theft of information or other misuse, or unauthorized access to a computer system for the purpose of “hacking,” was not explicitly covered by existing legislation. The first widespread attempt was made within the scope of the Comprehensive Crime Prevention Act of 1984. According to media reports at the time, some of Congress’s motives for this first law came from the House of Representatives who watched the 1983 movie. War game This represents a youthful computer hack. This limited first attempt was supplemented by CFAA, which includes the provisions of 18 USC §1030., title Fraud and related activities On the computer..
Cop convinces SCOTUS He is not a computer hacker
Source link Cop convinces SCOTUS He is not a computer hacker