[ad_1]
As the Uber litigation emerged, Lyft had largely gone untouched by similar claims until this year. However, like its competitor Uber, Lyft actively markets itself as a company that provides safe transportation for consumers, the lawsuits note.
The lawsuit filed on behalf of the woman identified as Jane Doe PWV 002 indicates that Lyft is failing to perform even basic background checks on its drivers, does not run fingerprints and does not check the applicants against available databases.
According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff requested a ride using the Lyft app in November. However, during the trip she noticed the driver was taking an unusually long route.
The lawsuit indicates he then stopped the vehicle on the side of the road, locked the plaintiff in the backseat and exited the vehicle. The plaintiff unlocked the car and got out, to find that the Lyft driver had exposed himself to masturbate before getting back in the car.
The plaintiff points to Lyft’s failures to secure passengers’ safety as even more egregious due to the proliferation of sexual predators among the drivers.
“Lyft’s response to this sexual predator crisis among Lyft drivers has been appallingly inadequate,” the lawsuit states. “Lyft continues to hire drivers without performing adequate background checks. Lyft continues to allow culpable drivers to keep driving for Lyft. And, perhaps most importantly, Lyft has failed to adopt and implement reasonable driver monitoring procedures designed to protect the safety of its passengers.”
The complaint presents claims for negligence, negligent hiring, retention and supervision, common carrier negligence, negligent failure to warn, liability for sexual assault and sexual battery, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, negligent infliction of emotional duress, breach of contract, and strict liability for design defect and failure to warn.
Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits
The growing number of Lyft sexual assault lawsuits have been filed in state and federal courts in California. Similarly, Uber sexual assault lawsuits have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings before U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California, as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation.
Following coordinated general discovery in the Uber sexual assault lawsuits, it is expected that the court will select a small group of representative claims to go through case-specific discovery and be prepared for early trial dates, which will be used to gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the litigation.
While the outcome of any bellwether trials in the MDL will not be binding on other claims, average Uber sexual assault lawsuit payouts awarded by juries may influence later settlement agreements. If no Uber sexual assault lawsuit settlement is reached, each individual claim may be remanded back to the U.S. District Court where it was originally filed for a future trial date.
[ad_2]
Source link
