Prince Harry wins damages in Mirror tabloid phone hacking case | #hacking | #cybersecurity | #infosec | #comptia | #pentest | #hacker

LONDON — Prince Harry was the victim of phone hacking and other unlawful media practices by Mirror Group Newspapers, a High Court judge ruled Friday, awarding the king’s younger son 140,600 pounds ($178,500) in damages.

Judge Timothy Fancourt found that Harry’s personal phone was targeted “to a modest extent” between 2003 and 2009 and that 15 out of 33 sample news articles resulted from hacking or illegal information gathering.

The case was one of four selected as tests to help the court set the level of damages for similar claims.

Harry said the ruling was “vindicating and affirming,” according to a statement read by his lawyer outside the court. He also called on police and prosecutors to “do their duty for the British public and to investigate bringing charges against the company and those who have broken the law.”

Prince Harry testifies in court about tabloid intrusion ‘since I was born’

In a statement, Mirror Group Newspapers said it welcomed the judgment, making it possible to “move forward” from events that took place long ago. “Where historical wrongdoing took place, we apologise unreservedly, have taken full responsibility and paid appropriate compensation.”

Harry was not there to hear the verdict Friday. But in June, he became the first high-ranking British royal in 130 years to testify in court, arguing that Mirror Group Newspapers used unlawful information-gathering to dig up dirt on him. He testified over two days.

Harry alleged that journalists at Mirror Group Newspapers’ titles — the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People — knew information about him that could have been discovered only through unlawful activity. His lawyers submitted 148 newspaper articles, dating from 1996 to 2010, and the trial considered 33 of those.

In his witness statement, Harry wrote that the alleged illegal snooping had fostered an environment of distrust within his circle of friends and family. He wrote that he could now see “how much of my life was wasted on this paranoia.”

The judge on Friday ruled that editors had been aware of what was going on. There was “compelling evidence that the editors of each newspaper knew very well that [phone hacking] was being used extensively and habitually and that they were happy to take the benefits of it,” Fancourt wrote in his judgment.

The judge also said “there can be no doubt” that Piers Morgan, a high-profile media figure and frequent critic of Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, knew that voice mail hacking provided material for stories while he was editor of the Daily Mirror.

Morgan has always denied involvement. Speaking to journalists outside his home Friday, he repeated that he had “never hacked a phone or told anyone else to hack a phone.” He said he had not been asked to “provide a statement” to the court, and therefore was “not able to respond” to accusations from “old foes with an ax to grind.” He noted that the court identified only one article about Harry from his tenure as editor in which unlawful practices may have been involved.

Morgan added that Harry “wouldn’t know truth if it slapped him in his California-tanned face.”

Earlier, outside the High Court, Harry’s lawyer David Sherborne read a statement on behalf of the prince.

“I’ve been told slaying dragons will get you burned. But in light of today’s victory and the importance of doing what is needed for a free and honest press, it is a worthwhile price to pay,” the statement said. “The mission continues.”

Harry has made it clear that he is on a quest to change Britain’s unruly tabloid media. He has repeatedly taken tabloids to court and has two other lawsuits against media companies that are working their way through British courts.

In his autobiography, “Spare,” Harry wrote extensively about the hounding he endured from the press, first as a child when his mother, Princess Diana, was constantly in the public eye and then later as an adult.


Click Here For The Original Story From This Source.

National Cyber Security