White House ‘free marketeers’ raised concerns over coronavirus price-gouging crackdown | #coronavirus | #scams | #covid19

“The White House folks had no involvement in charging decisions, but there is a degree of overlap with certain actions that need to be taken under the DPA, so there had to be some coordination,” the source added.

A White House official said Trump moved fast to target hoarders and price-gougers. “We’ve charged several of these scammers and as of early April we’ve distributed more than half a million medical supplies confiscated from price gougers,” the official said.

The resistance from White House staffers materialized shortly after the rollout of the task force, according to the people familiar with the situation. It came from staffers whom one source described as “free-marketeers,” who felt the massive influx of people wheeling and dealing for PPE was a sign that the free market was working efficiently to move materials where they needed to go. One free market tenet is that market forces act as an invisible hand, moving goods and services when and where they need to be in the most efficient way possible and unlocking supplies that may previously have gone untapped. If prices of, say, N95 masks seem exorbitantly high—well, that’s what market conditions dictate. Government intervention, in this view, only gums things up—at best. White House staffers who raised concerns about the task force’s work were of that school of thought.

Meanwhile, the news media were rife with stories about how unsavory characters were ripping off hospitals and local governments by charging them jaw-dropping sums for life-saving equipment. New York’s state government paid up to 15 times the typical price for PPE, according to a ProPublica analysis. And the top financial officer of one New York hospital told the Associated Press his team had to pay $7 for face masks that usually cost just 50 cents. For some hospital systems, the pandemic also brought grave financial peril.

The White House generally has limited visibility into the day-in-day-out work of the Justice Department. But DOJ officials discussed the task force’s work with the White House in part because they didn’t want to bring criminal charges against potential defendants who had already secured approval of their practices from other corners of the U.S. government.

Some White House and DOJ officials disagreed about how to use important legal tools known as “allocation orders,” which let U.S. government officials force dealers to sell them PPE at a price the officials deem fair, which they pay later, per one of the sources. Some White House aides wanted to pay sellers the prices they asked when using allocation orders, even if those prices seemed inflated, the source said. The Department of Health and Human Services had technical authority to issue allocation orders, but it was the White House that actually decided whether or not to issue them, according to a participant.

Another source described two broad mindsets at play. The first mindset was held by those with prosecutorial sensibilities, who viewed the massive, lightning-fast influx of newcomers into the PPE sector with deep suspicion. The second was held by the free market proponents, who saw it as a sign the invisible hand was doing what it does best: moving goods where they needed to go.

An administration official familiar with the back-and-forth said the historically challenging circumstances meant DOJ and White House officials had to navigate a new, uncharted gray area of legal and practical issues.

“There was an ongoing discussion, throughout the pursuing and building of the cases, about philosophical issues in play—prosecuting illegal activity, but not taking prosecutorial discretion to an extreme that wasn’t consistent with how DOJ would normally approach cases,” that source said. “The view that this was a philosophically complex issue was recognized both within the White House and within DOJ leadership, during a unique and unprecedented time.”

The task force’s record thus far has drawn criticism from the left. Kyle Herrig, head of the progressive government watchdog group Accountable.US, said it hasn’t done enough.

“The Trump administration has never met a consumer it wanted to protect or a nefarious business it wanted to prosecute. That the DOJ is allowing companies to take advantage of Americans during a global pandemic is as shocking as it is shameful,” he said in a statement. “The lack of price-gouging enforcement has cost Americans millions of dollars and endangered lives — further proof that the administration is not looking out for its citizens in a time of crisis.”

By Accountable.US’ count, more than 49,000 complaints about price-gouging have been submitted to law enforcement officials in 22 states. The number of complaints exponentially outnumbers the number of cases the DOJ task force has brought. The Eastern District of New York — whose top prosecutor will soon decamp for DOJ headquarters — has brought several, and the district of New Jersey charged the man who coughed at FBI agents.

The source familiar with the task force said these cases are quite complex, both legally and factually. Building them takes significant time and resources, that source said, and will be a long-term project for the task force.

Source link

Click here to go to the original Source of this story.


Get your CompTIA A+, Network+ White Hat-Hacker, Certified Web Intelligence Analyst and more starting at $35 a month. Click here for more details.

Leave a Reply

Shqip Shqip አማርኛ አማርኛ العربية العربية English English Français Français Deutsch Deutsch Português Português Русский Русский Español Español

National Cyber Security Consulting App







National Cyber Security Radio (Podcast) is now available for Alexa.  If you don't have an Alexa device, you can download the Alexa App for free for Google and Apple devices.