The U.S. government may be back on track to ban leading Chinese AI models, following the release of Kimi K3 — a powerful AI model developed by the Chinese startup Moonshot AI —last week. According to an Axios report released July 20, Trump’s administration is reigniting its push for a ban, citing cybersecurity concerns. Chinese models such as DeepSeek and Kimi K3 are open-weight, meaning their trained model weights are published for public download. This gives enterprises the option to keep their data in-house by self-hosting the models on private infrastructure, while slashing inference costs — characteristics that have led to rising adoption by U.S. companies.
Go deeper with TH Premium: AI and data centers
Citing several sources close to the administration, the Axios report says that the government had earlier made a series of attempts to curb growth and expansion of Chinese models in the U.S. over cybersecurity concerns, a move critics say will stifle competition and innovation and encourage monopolies. The U.S. Department of Commerce last year considered adding multiple Chinese AI labs, including DeepSeek, to its “Entity List,” a trade blacklist maintained by the department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) that limits foreign companies, research institutions, governments, and individuals from purchasing sensitive American hardware, software, or technology.
U.S. officials also considered a joint National Security Agency/Office of the National Cyber Director advisory to discourage the use of Chinese AI models, and drafted an executive order holding U.S. companies liable for security breaches involving hosted Chinese models. While these measures were initially paused due to internal pushback regarding market impacts, they have been revived following the release of new Chinese open-weight models.
According to the report, critics of the potential ban — such as former White House adviser Sriram Krishnan and David Sacks, an outside White House AI adviser — say the move would negatively impact innovation, while handing a monopoly of the market to leading U.S. AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic, which the report implies may have a hand in the push for a ban. “We are at a critical inflection point in AI policy. The leading closed labs, already a duopoly in terms of AI model revenue, want the government to eliminate their open-source competition,” wrote Sacks in an X post on Sunday.
Chinese AI models are being increasingly used by numerous American companies due to their relatively low cost and perceived matching capabilities with domestic alternatives. The open-weight nature of Chinese models such as DeepSeek V4 and Kimi K3 — which allows companies to download the models locally and host them on private servers — is driving adoption by giving enterprises data privacy and slashing API costs compared to closed Western alternatives. Conversely, self-hosting shifts the cost of GPUs, electricity, maintenance, networking, and model operations to the company, making it generally most economical for organizations with substantial and sustained AI usage.
Chinese open-weight models price their APIs well below comparable U.S. systems, with DeepSeek-V4-Pro charging $0.87 per million output tokens, compared with $50 for Anthropic’s frontier Claude Fable 5 model. This aggressive undercutting has caused a massive surge in developer adoption. CEO Brian Armstrong noted that Coinbase runs models like GLM-5.2 and Kimi in production, cutting their overall AI spending nearly in half even as their actual token consumption spiked.
Despite the rising adoption, the U.S. government cites cybersecurity concerns as a reason for a ban. Now, the question of whether a ban on Chinese AI models can be practically enforced arises, as blocking open-weight technology presents a technical and regulatory hurdle. For an individual or a small company just wanting to use DeepSeek via the website or the app despite a U.S. block, a VPN works fine. However, limited app availability and payment restrictions remain effective restrictions.
For enterprises that self-host rather than use the hosted app or API, enforcement gets harder for several reasons. Unlike closed-source APIs that require data to leave a company’s network by sending it to a third-party provider’s servers, open-weight models exist as downloadable files mirrored across public repositories like Hugging Face and independent torrents, making them hard to fully recall once released. Once an American enterprise downloads the weights, it can run the model entirely offline inside a private, air-gapped data center, which limits U.S. regulators’ ability to monitor which model is running locally.
Modifications further complicate enforcement. Companies routinely fine-tune, quantize, or distill these models, blending the Chinese base with domestic corporate data until provenance blurs and it becomes difficult to define where the foreign model ends and a new domestic one begins. Even under strict download bans, firms could host the models through subsidiaries, although that vector runs into know-your-customer rules at cloud providers and the extraterritorial reach of U.S. export controls.
However, the U.S. government may not need an outright ban. According to the Axios report, the strategy appears to be getting U.S. firms themselves to drop the models. Axios-cited government sources say that procurement rules, Entity List threats, and public pressure campaigns aimed at the companies using Chinese models may do the trick. The sources also say the government will “push to highlight potential backdoors and lack of security with Chinese models, and the governance issue that brings.”
Any ban or restrictions would be yet another event in ongoing broad trade tensions between the U.S. and China that have since extended into the AI industry. Washington had earlier placed export restrictions on critical computing hardware and equipment to China. It later eased restrictions, but Beijing now appears to be focused on developing domestic technologies, while urging Chinese companies to utilize them. The Trump administration has also made known its intention for the U.S. to dominate the AI race.
Follow Tom’s Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
