Actor Cha Ye-ryun has flatly denied the school violence allegations, and speculation about the background is growing as the online post where the allegations were first raised has become inaccessible. With rumors even suggesting a possible settlement running rampant, attention is on whether Cha Ye-ryun’s side will issue an additional statement.Earlier, on the 29th of last month, an online community post titled ’85-year-born actress school violence perpetrator please stop working’ was published. The author, a person referred to as A, claimed that actress C, born in 1985 and a graduate of Junggye Middle School, subjected her to persistent harassment and assault during their school years. She claimed she suffered injuries such as a torn eardrum from assaults in the classroom and restroom and demanded an apology from the actress and a halt to her broadcast activities.Afterward, online speculation identified the actress as Cha Ye-ryun. In response, Cha Ye-ryun’s agency, HB Entertainment, issued an official statement after verification saying “completely unfounded,” denying the school violence allegations. However, the controversy did not subside easily even after the agency’s denial. With no further verification conducted, conflicting claims emerged, and related comments appeared on Cha Ye-ryun’s YouTube channel and on her husband Joo Sang-Wook’s social media.Meanwhile, attention turned to the fact that the original post that first raised the allegations is now inaccessible. The post was temporarily restricted as of the 2nd under Article 44-2 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, it was reported. Attempting to access the original now reportedly shows a notice that the post has been deleted or does not exist. A temporary measure is a procedure to temporarily limit access to a post when it is difficult to immediately determine whether rights such as reputation have been infringed or when a dispute is expected. Therefore, the mere fact that the original cannot be viewed does not mean the author retracted the claims or that the post’s content has been proven false.Nevertheless, online reactions have included speculation that the post’s disappearance could indicate a possible settlement between the parties. However, no objective evidence supporting such speculation has been confirmed to date.In relation to the controversy surrounding Cha Ye-ryun’s YouTube channel, the production team directly issued a statement. On the 1st, the production team of the YouTube channel “Cha Ye-ryun Chajanggeum” announced, “We encountered this issue while on a trip to the United States with actress Cha Ye-ryun. We ask for your understanding that our response was delayed.” They added, “YouTube comments are managed at the production team’s discretion without involvement from the cast.” They also said, “While verification of the matter is ongoing, we will disable some videos and comment sections to prevent indiscriminate rumor spreading and personal attacks on the family.” By doing so, the production team explained their operational policy directly in response to speculation that comment management was at Cha Ye-ryun’s instruction.Notably, Cha Ye-ryun is married to actor Joo Sang-Wook and has a daughter, and she recently revealed her daughter’s face in a family photo spread. As the controversy spread, comments mentioning the wife’s allegations also appeared on Joo Sang-Wook’s social media, and interest has extended to the family. Voices are calling for greater caution about bringing a spouse and children into public scrutiny when the allegations against the person involved have not been confirmed.Above all, the only official positions confirmed so far are Cha Ye-ryun’s denial as “completely unfounded” and the YouTube production team’s explanation regarding comment management. The access restriction to the initial post also cannot be taken as evidence confirming the truth of the allegations. While claims of school violence should be thoroughly examined, it is also necessary to guard against expanding the controversy by adding new speculation when the facts have not been established.Whether the additional materials the original author promised will be released or whether Cha Ye-ryun’s side will issue an additional statement is drawing attention, but what is needed is objective fact-checking rather than speculation. Making allegations and treating them as facts are clearly different issues, so it seems necessary to be wary of indiscriminate speculation.[Photo] OSEN DB[OSEN]※ This article has been translated by AI. Share your feedback here.
Source link
——————————————————–
Click Here For The Original Source.
.........................
