Hossain, M. A., Quaddus, M., Warren, M., Akter, S. & Pappas, I. Are you a cyberbully on social media? Exploring the personality traits using a fuzzy-set configurational approach. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 66, 1–12 (2022).
DeSmet, A., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Walrave, M. & Vandebosch, H. Associations between bystander reactions to cyberbullying and victims’ emotional experiences and mental health. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 22, 648–656 (2019).
Wang, Y., Liu, Y. & Zhou, J. Cyberbullying victimization and nonsuicidal self-injury in early adolescents: a moderated mediation model of social anxiety and emotion reactivity. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 26, 393–400 (2023).
Leung, A. N. M., Wong, N. & Farver, J. M. Testing the effectiveness of an E-course to combat cyberbullying. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 22, 569–577 (2019).
Huang, C. L., Zhang, S. & Yang, S. C. How students react to different cyberbullying events: past experience, judgment, perceived seriousness, helping behavior and the effect of online disinhibition. Comput. Hum. Behav. 110, 106338 (2020).
Murshed, B. A. H. et al. FAEO-ECNN: cyberbullying detection in social media platforms using topic modelling and deep learning. Multimed. Tools Appl. 82, 46611–46650 (2023).
Pellicani, A., Pio, G., Redavid, D. & Ceci, M. SAIRUS: spatially-aware identification of risky users in social networks. Inf. Fus. 92, 435–449 (2023).
Ireland, L., Hawdon, J., Huang, B. & Peguero, A. Preconditions for guardianship interventions in cyberbullying: Incident interpretation, collective and automated efficacy, and relative popularity of bullies. Comput. Hum. Behav. 113, 106506 (2020).
Cho, D. & Kwon, K. H. The impacts of identity verification and disclosure of social cues on flaming in online user comments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 363–372 (2015).
McFarland, L. A., Hendricks, J. L. & Ward, W. B. A contextual framework for understanding impression management. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 33, 1–18 (2023).
Baumeister, R. E. & Tice, D. M. Four selves, two motives, and a substitute process self-regulation model. In Public Self and Private Self (ed. Baumeister, R. F.) 63–74 (Springer, 1986).
Google Scholar
Fenigstein, A. On the nature of public and private self-consciousness. J. Pers. 55, 543–554 (1987).
Leary, M. R. & Kowalski, R. M. Impression management: a literature review and two-component model. Psychol. Bull. 107, 34–47 (1990).
Howard, M. C. An epidemiological assessment of online groups and a test of a typology: What are the (dis)similarities of the online group types?. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 123–133 (2014).
Champniss, G., Wilson, H. N., Macdonald, E. K. & Dimitriu, R. No I won’t, but yes we will: driving sustainability-related donations through social identity effects. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 111, 317–326 (2016).
Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K., Benbasat, I., Xiao, B. & Lee, Z. W. Y. Bystanders join in cyberbullying on social networking sites: the deindividuation and moral disengagement perspectives. Inf. Syst. Res. 34, 828–846 (2023).
Jiang, Z. J., Heng, C. S. & Choi, B. C. F. Research note—privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 24, 579–595 (2013).
Lowry, P. B., Moody, G. D. & Chatterjee, S. Using IT design to prevent cyberbullying. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 34, 863–901 (2017).
Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K. & Lee, Z. W. Y. Cyberbullying on social networking sites: a literature review and future research directions. Inf. Manage. 58, 103411 (2021).
Li, Q. New bottle but old wine: a research of cyberbullying in schools. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 1777–1791 (2007).
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N. & Lattanner, M. R. Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1073–1137 (2014).
Tokunaga, R. S. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 277–287 (2010).
Chai, L. Does religion buffer against the detrimental effect of cyberbullying victimization on adults’ health and well-being? Evidence from the 2014 Canadian general social survey. J. Interpers. Violence 37, NP19983–NP20011 (2022).
Li, J., Wu, Y. & Hesketh, T. Internet use and cyberbullying: impacts on psychosocial and psychosomatic wellbeing among Chinese adolescents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 138, 107461 (2023).
Sciacca, B., Mazzone, A. & O’Higgins Norman, J. The mental health correlates of cybervictimisation against ethnic minority young people: A systematic review. Aggress. Violent Behav. 69, 101812 (2023).
Turliuc, M. N., Măirean, C. & Boca-Zamfir, M. The relation between cyberbullying and depressive symptoms in adolescence. The moderating role of emotion regulation strategies. Comput. Hum. Behav. 109, 106341 (2020).
Sheng, N., Yang, C., Han, L. & Jou, M. Too much overload and concerns: antecedents of social media fatigue and the mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Comput. Hum. Behav. 139, 107500 (2023).
Schunk, F., Zeh, F. & Trommsdorff, G. Cybervictimization and well-being among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating roles of emotional self-efficacy and emotion regulation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126, 107035 (2022).
Quintana-Orts, C., Rey, L. & Neto, F. Beyond cyberbullying: investigating when and how cybervictimization predicts suicidal ideation. J. Interpers. Violence 37, 935–957 (2022).
Zhang, Z., Xiao, H., Zhang, L. & Zheng, J. Linking cyberbullying to job strain: roles of ego depletion and self-efficacy. J. Aggress. Maltreatment Trauma 31, 798–815 (2022).
Mitchell, K. J., Jones, L. M. & Turner, H. A. Past year technology-involved peer harassment victimization and recent depressive symptoms and suicide ideation among a national sample of youth. J. Interpers. Violence 36, NP1165-1179NP (2021).
Yang, J., Li, S., Gao, L. & Wang, X. Longitudinal associations among peer pressure, moral disengagement and cyberbullying perpetration in adolescents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 137, 107420 (2022).
Costello, M., Hawdon, J., Ratliff, T. & Grantham, T. Who views online extremism? Individual attributes leading to exposure. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 311–320 (2016).
Salem, A. A. M. S. et al. Empathic skills training as a means of reducing cyberbullying among adolescents: an empirical evaluation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 20, 1846 (2023).
Sun, Y.-X. et al. Moral disengagement as mediator and guilt as moderator between cyber moral literacy and cyberbullying among late adolescents. Sci. Rep. 15, 43 (2025).
Google Scholar
Valdés-Cuervo, A. A. et al. Unique and interactive effects of guilt and sympathy on bystander aggressive defender intervention in cyberbullying: the mediation of self-regulation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 122, 106842 (2021).
Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P. & Llorent, V. J. Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles. Aggress. Violent Behav. 45, 83–97 (2019).
Zhao, L. & Yu, J. A meta-analytic review of moral disengagement and cyberbullying. Front. Psychol. 12, 681299 (2021).
Stults, B. J. & You, M. Self-control, cyberbullying, and the moderating effect of opportunity. Deviant Behav. 43, 1267–1284 (2022).
Vazsonyi, A. T., Mikuška, J. & Kelley, E. L. It’s time: a meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. J. Crim. Justice 48, 48–63 (2017).
Bussey, K. & Luo, A. Mindfulness as a moderator between the association of moral disengagement and cyberbullying. Int. J. Bully. Prev.
Google Scholar
Cho, D. & Acquisti, A. The more social cues, the less trolling? An empirical study of online commenting behavior. Proc. WEIS (2013).
Google Scholar
Dear, K., Dutton, K. & Fox, E. Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? A systematic review & meta-analysis. Evol. Hum. Behav. 40, 269–280 (2019).
Polanco-Levicán, K. & Salvo-Garrido, S. Bystander roles in cyberbullying: a mini-review of who, how many, and why. Front. Psychol. 12, 676787 (2021).
Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Li, C., Song, C. & Hsu, W. Does displaying one’s IP location influence users’ privacy behavior on social media? Evidence from China’s Weibo. Telecommun. Policy 48, 102759 (2024).
Penney, J. W. Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: a comparative case study. Internet Policy Rev. (2017).
Google Scholar
Calvo-Morata, A., Alonso-Fernández, C., Freire, M., Martínez-Ortiz, I. & Fernández-Manjón, B. Serious games to prevent and detect bullying and cyberbullying: a systematic serious games and literature review. Comput. Educ. 157, 103958 (2020).
Ryoo, Y. & Kim, W. Approach versus avoidance: a self-regulatory perspective on hypocrisy induction in anti-cyberbullying CSR campaigns. J. Bus. Ethics 189, 345–364 (2024).
Blaya, C. Cyberhate: a review and content analysis of intervention strategies. Aggress. Violent Behav. 45, 163–172 (2019).
Yu, C. & Margolin, D. Topic territoriality and the cost of civility: examining the impact of IP address disclosure on Weibo. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 29, zmae018 (2024).
Zhu, Y. Privacy cynicism and diminishing utility of state surveillance: a natural experiment of mandatory location disclosure on China’s Weibo. Big Data Soc. 11, 20539517241242450 (2024).
Zhao, G. Digital geospatial construction on Chinese social media based on IP geolocation. Mob. Media Commun. 13, 386–406 (2025).
Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Wang, C. & Siponen, M. Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Inf. Syst. Res. 27, 962–986 (2016).
Suler, J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 7, 321–326 (2004).
Penney, J. W. Chilling effects: online surveillance and wikipedia use. Berkeley Technol. Law J. 31, 117–182 (2016).
Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, 1959).
Walther, J. B. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 2538–2557 (2007).
Gardner, W. L. & Martinko, M. J. Impression management in organizations. J. Manag. 14, 321–338 (1988).
Arkin, R. M., Appelman, A. J. & Burger, J. M. Social anxiety, self-presentation, and the self-serving bias in causal attribution. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38, 23–35 (1980).
House, W. C. Effects of knowledge that attributions will be observed by others. J. Res. Personal. 14, 528–545 (1980).
Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. & Manstead, A. S. Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: a useful dichotomy?. Psychol. Rev. 92, 59–77 (1985).
Toma, C. L. & Hancock, J. T. Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Commun. Res. 37, 335–351 (2010).
Douglas, K. M. & McGarty, C. Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 399–416 (2001).
Joinson, A. N. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: the role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 31, 177–192 (2001).
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A. T. & Novak, R. J. Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 747–763 (2005).
Smith, H. J. & Tyler, T. R. Choosing the right pond: the impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 33, 146–170 (1997).
Tyler, T. R. & Lind, E. A. A relational model of authority in groups. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (eds Tyler, T. R. & Lind, E. A.) 115–191 (Elsevier, 1992).
Tropp, L. R. & Wright, S. C. Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27, 585–600 (2001).
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P. & Flament, C. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1, 149–178 (1971).
Spears, R., Doosje, B. & Ellemers, N. Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: the role of group identification. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23, 538–553 (1997).
Crocker, J. & Luhtanen, R. Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 60–67 (1990).
Petta, G. & Walker, I. Relative deprivation and ethnic identity. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 31, 285–293 (1992).
Tropp, L. R. & Wright, S. C. Ingroup identification and relative deprivation: an examination across multiple social comparisons. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29, 707–724 (1999).
Ren, Y. et al. Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal Bonds1. MIS Q. 36, 841–863 (2012).
Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A. & Wellman, B. Geography of Twitter networks. Soc. Netw. 34, 73–81 (2012).
Talhelm, T. et al. Large-scale psychological differences within china explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science 344, 603–608 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Am. 223, 96–103 (1970).
Google Scholar
Van Ouytsel, J. & Dhoest, A. The prevalence, context and perceptions of sexting among non-heterosexual men from various generations in Belgium. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126, 107031 (2022).
Diener, E. Effects of prior destructive behavior, anonymity, and group presence on deindividuation and aggression. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 33, 497–507 (1976).
Bansal, P. & Clelland, I. Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Manage. J. 47, 93–103 (2004).
Ashford, S. J. & Northcraft, G. B. Conveying more (or less) than we realize: the role of impression-management in feedback-seeking. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 53, 310–334 (1992).
Gibbs, J. L., Rozaidi, N. A. & Eisenberg, J. Overcoming the “ideology of openness”: probing the affordances of social media for organizational knowledge sharing. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 19, 102–120 (2013).
Bradley, G. W. Self-serving biases in the attribution process: a reexamination of the fact or fiction question. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36, 56–71 (1978).
Google Scholar
Reis, H. T. & Gruzen, J. On mediating equity, equality, and self-interest: The role of self-presentation in social exchange. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 12, 487–503 (1976).
Schlenker, B. R. Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations (Brooks/Cole Pub. Co, 1980).
Lee, G., Cho, S. Y., Arthurs, J. & Lee, E. K. Celebrity CEO, identity threat, and impression management: Impact of celebrity status on corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Res. 111, 69–84 (2020).
Deng, T., Lai, Y. & Tang, C. Does the leader’s negative feedback benefit employees’ creative process engagement? The mediating effect of impression management motivation. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 44, 103–119 (2023).
Mitchell, T. D. & Bommer, W. H. The interactive effects of motives and task coordination on leadership emergence. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 22, 223–235 (2018).
Grant, A. M. & Mayer, D. M. Good soldiers and good actors: prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 94, 900–912 (2009).
Rosenberg, J. & Egbert, N. Online impression management: personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 17, 1–18 (2011).
Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C. & Harden, J. M. Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Commun. Monogr. 56, 19–38 (1989).
Blader, S. L. & Tyler, T. R. Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 94, 445–464 (2009).
Moorman, R. H. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. J. Appl. Psychol. 76, 845–855 (1991).
Organ, D. W. & Moorman, R. H. Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: what are the conncections?. Soc. Justice Res. 6, 5–18 (1993).
Buss, A. H. & Briggs, S. R. Drama and the self in social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47, 1310–1324 (1984).
Larson, R. B. Controlling social desirability bias. Int. J. Mark. Res. 61, 534–547 (2019).
Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K. & Wong, R. Y. M. Cyberbullying on social networking sites: the crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 36, 574–609 (2019).
Lowry, P. B. et al. An integrative theory addressing cyberharassment in the light of technology-based opportunism. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 36, 1142–1178 (2019).
Lam, W., Huang, X. & Snape, E. Feedback-seeking behavior and leader-member exchange: do supervisor-attributed motives matter?. Acad. Manage. J. 50, 348–363 (2007).
Mael, F. & Ashforth, B. E. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 13, 103–123 (1992).
Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Baker, V. L. & Mayer, D. M. Why employees do bad things: moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Pers. Psychol. 65, 1–48 (2012).
Zhu, Y. & Grover, V. Privacy in the sharing economy: why don’t users disclose their negative experiences?. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 67, 102543 (2022).
Barlett, C. P., Seyfert, L. W., Rinker, A. M. & Roth, B. R. The moderating role of dispositional fear of retaliation in cyberbullying perpetration processes. Personal. Individ. Differ. 196, 111731 (2022).
Wang, L. & Ngai, S. S. The effects of anonymity, invisibility, asynchrony, and moral disengagement on cyberbullying perpetration among school-aged children in China. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 119, 105613 (2020).
Bourdage, J. S., Roulin, N. & Tarraf, R. “I (might be) just that good”: honest and deceptive impression management in employment interviews. Pers. Psychol. 71, 597–632 (2018).
Swider, B. W., Barrick, M. R. & Harris, T. B. Initial impressions: what they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 101, 625–638 (2016).
Van Iddekinge, C. H., McFarland, L. A. & Raymark, P. H. Antecedents of impression management use and effectiveness in a structured interview†. J. Manag. 33, 752–773 (2007).
Choi, B. K., Moon, H. K. & Chun, J. U. Impression management motive and voice: Moderating effects of self-monitoring, self-efficacy, and voice instrumentality. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 18, 225–235 (2015).
Gabriel, A. S., Koopman, J., Rosen, C. C., Arnold, J. D. & Hochwarter, W. A. Are coworkers getting into the act? An examination of emotion regulation in coworker exchanges. J. Appl. Psychol. 105, 907–929 (2020).
Guzman, F. A. & Espejo, A. Dispositional and situational differences in motives to engage in citizenship behavior. J. Bus. Res. 68, 208–215 (2015).
Wang, J., Zhang, Z. & Jia, M. Doing good or looking good: how socially responsible human resource management practices influence employees’ CSR-specific performance. J. Manag. Psychol. 38, 225–244 (2023).
Marks, D. & Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action (SAGE Publications Ltd, 2002).
Latané, B. The psychology of social impact. Am. Psychol. 36, 343–356 (1981).
