Kids, Cosmetics And Social Media: Are We Normalising Adult Beauty Standards Too Early? | Explainers News | #childpredator | #kidsaftey | #childsaftey

Last Updated:August 18, 2026, 16:46 IST

A teenager experimenting with lipstick is not necessarily a behavioural problem. The concern begins when appearance becomes something a child feels unable to step away from

Enjoying make-up, wanting to try a new lipstick or copying an influencer does not automatically mean a child is addicted. Compulsive behaviour is different. It involves a loss of control or a growing dependence on a behaviour.

A child’s school bag carries books, lunch and perhaps a water bottle. In some Kerala schools, teachers are finding lipsticks, kajal, mascara and other cosmetics. Some students reportedly use them during breaks, while others have developed elaborate skincare and grooming routines at home.

In one reported case, a 13-year-old described using retinol creams and collagen-boosting serums after watching ‘Get Ready With Me’ videos online. Some children are buying lipsticks for less than Rs 50. The trend has become serious enough for Kerala’s Child Welfare Committee (CWC) to launch a “lipstick-free campuses” awareness campaign, with schools in districts including Kollam and Kozhikode taking steps to restrict cosmetics on their premises.

When does childhood experimentation with appearance become social pressure, compulsive behaviour or a consumer-health risk?

When Lipstick Becomes A School Problem

Kerala’s campaign is not simply about children wearing make-up. The immediate concern is the increasing use of cosmetics, particularly inexpensive products whose ingredients and quality may be difficult for consumers to assess.

The CWC’s campaign began with awareness sessions for students, parents and schools, with the aim of educating children about potential risks from unsafe cosmetics. Schools completing the awareness programme can be designated as “lipstick-free campuses”. The campaign is also expected to extend into communities, while authorities have called for greater scrutiny of shops selling cosmetics near schools.

Some schools have already introduced restrictions. But the state has not imposed a blanket state-wide ban on lipstick or make-up in schools. The approach is centred on awareness and school-level action rather than treating cosmetics themselves as inherently dangerous.

A teenager experimenting with lipstick is not necessarily showing a behavioural problem. The concern begins when appearance becomes something a child feels unable to step away from, or when cheap, potentially unsafe products become part of that routine.

Why Are Children Drawn To Cosmetics?

Make-up has always been part of childhood experimentation. Children play with their parents’ cosmetics, try different hairstyles and imitate adults. What has changed is the sheer amount of beauty content they encounter.

A child can now watch skincare routines, make-up tutorials and “Get Ready With Me” videos every day. Products that were once discovered in a parent’s bathroom are now presented directly to children through social media feeds, influencers and online shopping platforms.

That exposure can turn beauty from something occasional into something that feels necessary. The New Indian Express report described children following online skincare routines and carrying extensive cosmetic kits to school.

Research suggests that this environment can affect how young people evaluate themselves. A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis covering 45 studies and more than 33,000 adolescents found a significant association between greater social-media engagement and body-image concerns, eating-related symptoms and internalisation of appearance ideals.

A 2026 ‘Adolescent Skincare Practices in the Era of Social Media: Implications for Self-Perception and Body Image‘ study of 612 adolescents aged 13 to 17 found that social media was the primary source of skincare information for 82% of participants, while only 34% followed evidence-based routines. Nearly one-third reported side effects from their skincare practices.

The issue, then, is not simply that children want to look good. It is that the definition of what “looking good” means is increasingly being supplied by a commercial digital environment.

Is This Really ‘Addiction’?

Enjoying make-up, wanting to try a new lipstick or copying an influencer does not automatically mean a child is addicted. Compulsive behaviour is different. It involves a loss of control or a growing dependence on a behaviour despite negative consequences.

For parents, the more useful question is whether cosmetics have become emotionally necessary. Does a child become extremely distressed when make-up is unavailable? Are they constantly checking their appearance? Are they hiding purchases or spending money they should not be spending? Do they feel unable to attend school or social events without looking a certain way?

These behaviours can signal that the issue is no longer simply self-expression. At the same time, adults need to be careful about turning ordinary insecurity into pathology. Adolescence is a period when identity and appearance naturally become important. The goal should be to understand the pressure around the behaviour rather than shame a child for caring about how they look.

What Is The Hidden Consumer Health Issue?

Not every cheap cosmetic is toxic, and not every branded cosmetic is automatically safe. But counterfeit, poorly labelled or improperly manufactured products can create additional risks, particularly when used around the eyes or on sensitive skin.

Kerala’s campaign has raised concerns about low-cost products containing heavy metals such as mercury, lead and cadmium. A previous state enforcement exercise reportedly found extremely high mercury levels in some lipsticks seized from schools. However, such findings from specific products should not be interpreted as proof that all lipsticks or cosmetics are dangerous.

The risks associated with unsafe cosmetics are real. Eye cosmetics, for example, can become contaminated with bacteria and cause infections if they are old, shared or improperly handled. Traditional kohl or kajal products containing lead can pose particular risks to children.

Officials warned that the build-up of these substances in the body can harm not only children’s skin but also vital internal organs.

The World Health Organization identifies cosmetic products such as skin-lightening creams and soaps as important sources of inorganic mercury exposure among children.

The key issue is therefore not “makeup equals cancer”. It is whether children are being exposed repeatedly to products whose ingredients, manufacturing standards or authenticity are uncertain.

Social Media’s Beauty Pipeline

A child watches a beauty video, the creator recommends a product and the child wants to try it. Friends are using similar products. Filters and carefully edited images create an appearance standard. Online shopping makes the product easy to obtain. The child then compares their appearance with what they see online and starts looking for another product to fix the next perceived flaw. That cycle can turn appearance into a form of social currency.

A 2025 meta-analysis of 83 studies involving more than 55,000 participants found that greater online social comparison was associated with greater body-image concerns and eating-disorder symptoms, while being associated with lower positive body image.

But the evidence is not entirely one-directional. A 2025 longitudinal study of 2,500 adolescents found that appearance-focused social media activity did not necessarily lead to greater body dissatisfaction over time within individuals. That is an important reminder that social media is a risk factor, not a single explanation for every child’s behaviour.

Is Banning Make-Up The Answer?

A school ban may make it easier to enforce a uniform policy, but it cannot remove the beauty culture that children encounter outside school.

A child can leave a lipstick at home and still spend hours watching make-up videos, comparing appearances and shopping online. Simply confiscating cosmetics therefore addresses the visible behaviour without necessarily addressing the pressure behind it.

Kerala’s own campaign points towards a broader approach by combining restrictions with awareness sessions for children and parents. The more sustainable response may involve teaching children how advertising, filters and influencer content work, explaining how to assess product safety and creating space to discuss appearance without ridicule.

Schools can also distinguish between grooming rules and health risks. A student violating a school uniform policy is one issue; a child using an unlabelled product around the eyes is another.

What Parents Should Watch For

For parents, occasional make-up experimentation is not automatically a warning sign. Concern should rise when appearance begins to dominate a child’s daily life.

Repeated distress without make-up, constant mirror-checking, hiding purchases, excessive spending, refusing to participate in activities without looking a certain way, or becoming intensely preoccupied with perceived flaws are more meaningful signals than simply owning lipstick.

The same applies to physical symptoms. Persistent irritation, rashes, eye problems or other reactions after using cosmetics should not be ignored.

The bigger lesson from Kerala is that children’s relationship with beauty is changing faster than many adults realise. The answer is unlikely to be a simple choice between allowing everything and banning everything. The challenge is to help children understand that make-up can be a form of play or self-expression without allowing appearance to become the measure of their worth.

Key Questions Answered

Powered by

Ask News18

How can parents help children navigate social media beauty pressures?

Parents can help children navigate social media beauty pressures by teaching them about advertising, filters, and influencer content, explaining how to assess product safety, and creating a space to discuss appearance without ridicule.

What are the long-term health risks of early cosmetic use?

The long-term health risks of early cosmetic use include potential bowel cancer in children due to toxic heavy metals like mercury and cadmium found in products. Children’s thinner, more sensitive skin absorbs chemical substances faster, making them more vulnerable. Eye cosmetics, if not removed properly, can increase inflammatory markers by up to 40%, leading to chronic conditions such as dry eyes, light sensitivity, and contact lens intolerance.

Will other Indian states adopt similar ‘lipstick-free’ campaigns?

It is not yet known if other Indian states will adopt similar ‘lipstick-free’ campaigns.

Powered by

Ask News18

About the Author

Shilpy Bisht

Shilpy Bisht is a News Editor at News18, where she leads the English app operations. She writes on world affairs, health, AI, career, business, and issues affecting women and children. A former print …Read More

In one reported case, a 13-year-old described using retinol creams and collagen-boosting serums after watching ‘Get Ready With Me’ videos online. Some children are buying lipsticks for less than Rs 50. The trend has become serious enough for Kerala’s Child Welfare Committee (CWC) to launch a “lipstick-free campuses” awareness campaign, with schools in districts including Kollam and Kozhikode taking steps to restrict cosmetics on their premises.

When does childhood experimentation with appearance become social pressure, compulsive behaviour or a consumer-health risk?

When Lipstick Becomes A School Problem

Kerala’s campaign is not simply about children wearing make-up. The immediate concern is the increasing use of cosmetics, particularly inexpensive products whose ingredients and quality may be difficult for consumers to assess.

The CWC’s campaign began with awareness sessions for students, parents and schools, with the aim of educating children about potential risks from unsafe cosmetics. Schools completing the awareness programme can be designated as “lipstick-free campuses”. The campaign is also expected to extend into communities, while authorities have called for greater scrutiny of shops selling cosmetics near schools.

Some schools have already introduced restrictions. But the state has not imposed a blanket state-wide ban on lipstick or make-up in schools. The approach is centred on awareness and school-level action rather than treating cosmetics themselves as inherently dangerous.

A teenager experimenting with lipstick is not necessarily showing a behavioural problem. The concern begins when appearance becomes something a child feels unable to step away from, or when cheap, potentially unsafe products become part of that routine.

Why Are Children Drawn To Cosmetics?

Make-up has always been part of childhood experimentation. Children play with their parents’ cosmetics, try different hairstyles and imitate adults. What has changed is the sheer amount of beauty content they encounter.

A child can now watch skincare routines, make-up tutorials and “Get Ready With Me” videos every day. Products that were once discovered in a parent’s bathroom are now presented directly to children through social media feeds, influencers and online shopping platforms.

That exposure can turn beauty from something occasional into something that feels necessary. The New Indian Express report described children following online skincare routines and carrying extensive cosmetic kits to school.

Research suggests that this environment can affect how young people evaluate themselves. A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis covering 45 studies and more than 33,000 adolescents found a significant association between greater social-media engagement and body-image concerns, eating-related symptoms and internalisation of appearance ideals.

A 2026 ‘Adolescent Skincare Practices in the Era of Social Media: Implications for Self-Perception and Body Image‘ study of 612 adolescents aged 13 to 17 found that social media was the primary source of skincare information for 82% of participants, while only 34% followed evidence-based routines. Nearly one-third reported side effects from their skincare practices.

The issue, then, is not simply that children want to look good. It is that the definition of what “looking good” means is increasingly being supplied by a commercial digital environment.

Is This Really ‘Addiction’?

Enjoying make-up, wanting to try a new lipstick or copying an influencer does not automatically mean a child is addicted. Compulsive behaviour is different. It involves a loss of control or a growing dependence on a behaviour despite negative consequences.

For parents, the more useful question is whether cosmetics have become emotionally necessary. Does a child become extremely distressed when make-up is unavailable? Are they constantly checking their appearance? Are they hiding purchases or spending money they should not be spending? Do they feel unable to attend school or social events without looking a certain way?

These behaviours can signal that the issue is no longer simply self-expression. At the same time, adults need to be careful about turning ordinary insecurity into pathology. Adolescence is a period when identity and appearance naturally become important. The goal should be to understand the pressure around the behaviour rather than shame a child for caring about how they look.

What Is The Hidden Consumer Health Issue?

Not every cheap cosmetic is toxic, and not every branded cosmetic is automatically safe. But counterfeit, poorly labelled or improperly manufactured products can create additional risks, particularly when used around the eyes or on sensitive skin.

Kerala’s campaign has raised concerns about low-cost products containing heavy metals such as mercury, lead and cadmium. A previous state enforcement exercise reportedly found extremely high mercury levels in some lipsticks seized from schools. However, such findings from specific products should not be interpreted as proof that all lipsticks or cosmetics are dangerous.

The risks associated with unsafe cosmetics are real. Eye cosmetics, for example, can become contaminated with bacteria and cause infections if they are old, shared or improperly handled. Traditional kohl or kajal products containing lead can pose particular risks to children.

Officials warned that the build-up of these substances in the body can harm not only children’s skin but also vital internal organs.

The World Health Organization identifies cosmetic products such as skin-lightening creams and soaps as important sources of inorganic mercury exposure among children.

The key issue is therefore not “makeup equals cancer”. It is whether children are being exposed repeatedly to products whose ingredients, manufacturing standards or authenticity are uncertain.

Social Media’s Beauty Pipeline

A child watches a beauty video, the creator recommends a product and the child wants to try it. Friends are using similar products. Filters and carefully edited images create an appearance standard. Online shopping makes the product easy to obtain. The child then compares their appearance with what they see online and starts looking for another product to fix the next perceived flaw. That cycle can turn appearance into a form of social currency.

A 2025 meta-analysis of 83 studies involving more than 55,000 participants found that greater online social comparison was associated with greater body-image concerns and eating-disorder symptoms, while being associated with lower positive body image.

But the evidence is not entirely one-directional. A 2025 longitudinal study of 2,500 adolescents found that appearance-focused social media activity did not necessarily lead to greater body dissatisfaction over time within individuals. That is an important reminder that social media is a risk factor, not a single explanation for every child’s behaviour.

Is Banning Make-Up The Answer?

A school ban may make it easier to enforce a uniform policy, but it cannot remove the beauty culture that children encounter outside school.

A child can leave a lipstick at home and still spend hours watching make-up videos, comparing appearances and shopping online. Simply confiscating cosmetics therefore addresses the visible behaviour without necessarily addressing the pressure behind it.

Kerala’s own campaign points towards a broader approach by combining restrictions with awareness sessions for children and parents. The more sustainable response may involve teaching children how advertising, filters and influencer content work, explaining how to assess product safety and creating space to discuss appearance without ridicule.

Schools can also distinguish between grooming rules and health risks. A student violating a school uniform policy is one issue; a child using an unlabelled product around the eyes is another.

What Parents Should Watch For

For parents, occasional make-up experimentation is not automatically a warning sign. Concern should rise when appearance begins to dominate a child’s daily life.

Repeated distress without make-up, constant mirror-checking, hiding purchases, excessive spending, refusing to participate in activities without looking a certain way, or becoming intensely preoccupied with perceived flaws are more meaningful signals than simply owning lipstick.

The same applies to physical symptoms. Persistent irritation, rashes, eye problems or other reactions after using cosmetics should not be ignored.

The bigger lesson from Kerala is that children’s relationship with beauty is changing faster than many adults realise. The answer is unlikely to be a simple choice between allowing everything and banning everything. The challenge is to help children understand that make-up can be a form of play or self-expression without allowing appearance to become the measure of their worth.

Stay Ahead, Read Faster

Scan the QR code to download the News18 app and enjoy a seamless news experience anytime, anywhere.

login