A disturbing video allegedly depicting the torture and death of Chinese actor Yu Menglong has reportedly surfaced on the dark web, adding new weight to growing public suspicions surrounding his death. Hackers are said to have obtained the footage by breaching the phone of actress Song Yiren—one of the suspects—and leaking the recording online. Meanwhile, an investor in China has claimed that mounting public outcry is proving effective and shared strategies to pressure those behind the crime.
Dark Web leak and hacking claims
On Oct. 8, Malaysian netizen Carol shared on social media that her American friend had paid to access the video on the dark web. According to her, the entire incident had been recorded by Song Yiren herself. Hackers allegedly extracted the video from her phone and uploaded it online. Several Taiwanese media outlets have also reported that U.S. netizens viewed the footage, and some users say it has been reported to the FBI.
The content described by Carol aligns closely with previously circulating rumors. She claims Yu attended a private party with his dog, “Fuli.” At the gathering, he was pressured to hand over a USB drive. When he refused, the perpetrators allegedly began pulling out his fingernails. Fuli, attempting to protect his owner, was reportedly killed by suspects Fan Shiqi and Cheng Qingsong. Yu’s other dog, “Ham,” remained at home and is believed to have survived.
Carol herself refused to watch the leaked footage, saying her friend described it as “unbearably cruel.” According to secondhand accounts, Yu was gang-raped, tortured, and eventually thrown from a building. His body reportedly showed multiple fractures and an open abdominal wound.
Leaked Posts and Audio Evidence
In a viral post by user @jessica03919, a chilling message was shared: “A hacker broke into Song Yiren’s phone and recovered the footage showing the brutal torture and killing of Yu Menglong. It was horrifying—truly the work of demons in human form.”
Success
You are now signed up for our newsletter
Success
Check your email to complete sign up
A day earlier, on Oct. 7, the X account “News Investigation” published footage allegedly showing Yu after surgery had been performed on his abdomen. The clip names Fan Shiqi as the individual who cut him open to extract the USB drive.
On Oct. 8, Fan briefly posted—and then quickly deleted—a message on his social media account admitting responsibility for Yu’s death. Netizens managed to capture screenshots before the deletion. An earlier post by Fan added to suspicions: beneath one of his photos, he had written, “Since childhood, I vowed to eliminate those more handsome than me. My sword has yet to be drawn.” The statement has since been widely interpreted as a glimpse into his violent and jealous mindset.
Further adding to the case, a widely circulated audio clip features someone shouting, “Spit it out! Hurry!” and “Knock him out!”—phrases believed to be shouted during the alleged torture. The voice is suspected to be Fan’s, prompting netizens to grimly nickname him “the surgeon of slit stomachs.”
Audio forensics and last words
Other online clips reportedly show Yu screaming “Fan Xiaohua, save me!” just before falling from the building. A separate audio file features a man hurling vulgar abuse while allegedly torturing Yu. Forensic analysis of the voice reportedly yielded a 99.57 percent match with Fan Shiqi.
On Oct. 8, a prominent investor in the Chinese film industry claimed via an X (formerly Twitter) post that public voices supporting Yu Menglong have been highly effective—and that authorities have begun to notice, though the subject remains sensitive. He suggested that the official investigation notices around Yu’s death were softened or delayed, perhaps to stabilize or conceal information about “that person” (possibly referring to the murderer or a political figure), so as not to alert them.
The insider urged netizens to keep speaking out, asserting that those behind the crime fear public opinion more than anything. He said he recently visited a spiritual advisor connected to the entertainment world, who told him that higher‑dimensional forces are aiding Yu’s cause—though they cannot intervene directly.
He predicted that changes would begin next month: those who participated in Yu’s demise will see their fortunes crumble, and the key orchestrator will come under scrutiny—but not via the Yu case itself. He warned that the perpetrators will not be exposed under the banner of Yu’s case, to avoid drawing attention to deeper connections.
The investor also offered practical advice: Yu’s former studio registered multiple companies, so reporting those entities may draw official attention. He recommended persistently sending complaints to drain the suspects’ financial resources, reasoning that controlling public sentiment is costly—he estimated it could cost at least 100 million yuan every ten days. He encouraged netizens to sustain pressure for one to two months so that those responsible are forced to dig into their reserves, ultimately fomenting internal strife.
He added that he strongly believes an upcoming drama will face widespread boycott — not because of weak acting or directing, but because its screenwriter, Fang Li, is allegedly among the suspects involved in Yu Menglong’s case.
Mainland netizens rally around Yu Menglong’s death despite censorship
Yu Menglong’s death, shrouded in disturbing allegations and unanswered questions, has sparked a groundswell of outrage online. Despite the Chinese authorities’ efforts to suppress the story—refusing to open a formal investigation, punishing platforms, and detaining vocal citizens—netizens across the country continue to defy censorship. Their unified calls for justice have turned a tragic incident into a broader awakening of conscience. Many who had never followed Yu’s career now demand accountability on his behalf.
Some users noted that discussion around Yu’s death spikes during the early morning hours on Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok), when censors are less active. Strategically timing their posts, netizens aim to avoid mass deletions and keep the story alive.
In a recent livestream hosted by Beijing’s tourism board, viewers flooded the comment section with biting sarcasm aimed at the state narrative:
“How do Beijing residents go downstairs?”
“Is 37 a safe age to visit?”
“I wouldn’t dare go—what if I don’t live past 37?”
“Is this itinerary one-way only?”
“You leave Beijing a dreamer, return a ghost.”
“Freefall and extreme disco? No thanks!”
On October 8, a video surfaced showing a massive outdoor screen above the entrance of Wuyue Plaza in Jiangsu looping a series of close-ups of Yu Menglong. Though the display featured no sound, the haunting message read simply: “I am Yu Menglong.”
After the video appeared on Bilibili, China’s leading video-sharing platform, users commented that similar displays had appeared in multiple cities. One user posted: “October 8—we are here. Never abandon, never give up.” Another shared an image of Yu with a slogan: “One team, one cause. Fight together, win together.”
When the video reached X (formerly Twitter), overseas users chimed in with encouragement and admiration:
“These netizens are not to be messed with. Keep it up!”
“These self-funded displays are sparks of light—China’s hope for the future.”
“Yu Menglong was sent by God to bring down the CCP.”
“Water can carry a boat, but also capsize it. No regime survives when it turns against the people.”
This grassroots movement—resilient, creative, and emotionally charged—has transformed a silenced tragedy into a rallying cry for truth.
A disturbing video allegedly depicting the torture and death of Chinese actor Yu Menglong has reportedly surfaced on the dark web, adding new weight to growing public suspicions surrounding his death. Hackers are said to have obtained the footage by breaching the phone of actress Song Yiren—one of the suspects—and leaking the recording online. Meanwhile, an investor in China has claimed that mounting public outcry is proving effective and shared strategies to pressure those behind the crime.
Dark Web leak and hacking claims
On Oct. 8, Malaysian netizen Carol shared on social media that her American friend had paid to access the video on the dark web. According to her, the entire incident had been recorded by Song Yiren herself. Hackers allegedly extracted the video from her phone and uploaded it online. Several Taiwanese media outlets have also reported that U.S. netizens viewed the footage, and some users say it has been reported to the FBI.
The content described by Carol aligns closely with previously circulating rumors. She claims Yu attended a private party with his dog, “Fuli.” At the gathering, he was pressured to hand over a USB drive. When he refused, the perpetrators allegedly began pulling out his fingernails. Fuli, attempting to protect his owner, was reportedly killed by suspects Fan Shiqi and Cheng Qingsong. Yu’s other dog, “Ham,” remained at home and is believed to have survived.
Carol herself refused to watch the leaked footage, saying her friend described it as “unbearably cruel.” According to secondhand accounts, Yu was gang-raped, tortured, and eventually thrown from a building. His body reportedly showed multiple fractures and an open abdominal wound.
Leaked Posts and Audio Evidence
In a viral post by user @jessica03919, a chilling message was shared: “A hacker broke into Song Yiren’s phone and recovered the footage showing the brutal torture and killing of Yu Menglong. It was horrifying—truly the work of demons in human form.”
Success
You are now signed up for our newsletter
Success
Check your email to complete sign up
A day earlier, on Oct. 7, the X account “News Investigation” published footage allegedly showing Yu after surgery had been performed on his abdomen. The clip names Fan Shiqi as the individual who cut him open to extract the USB drive.
On Oct. 8, Fan briefly posted—and then quickly deleted—a message on his social media account admitting responsibility for Yu’s death. Netizens managed to capture screenshots before the deletion. An earlier post by Fan added to suspicions: beneath one of his photos, he had written, “Since childhood, I vowed to eliminate those more handsome than me. My sword has yet to be drawn.” The statement has since been widely interpreted as a glimpse into his violent and jealous mindset.
Further adding to the case, a widely circulated audio clip features someone shouting, “Spit it out! Hurry!” and “Knock him out!”—phrases believed to be shouted during the alleged torture. The voice is suspected to be Fan’s, prompting netizens to grimly nickname him “the surgeon of slit stomachs.”
Audio forensics and last words
Other online clips reportedly show Yu screaming “Fan Xiaohua, save me!” just before falling from the building. A separate audio file features a man hurling vulgar abuse while allegedly torturing Yu. Forensic analysis of the voice reportedly yielded a 99.57 percent match with Fan Shiqi.
On Oct. 8, a prominent investor in the Chinese film industry claimed via an X (formerly Twitter) post that public voices supporting Yu Menglong have been highly effective—and that authorities have begun to notice, though the subject remains sensitive. He suggested that the official investigation notices around Yu’s death were softened or delayed, perhaps to stabilize or conceal information about “that person” (possibly referring to the murderer or a political figure), so as not to alert them.
The insider urged netizens to keep speaking out, asserting that those behind the crime fear public opinion more than anything. He said he recently visited a spiritual advisor connected to the entertainment world, who told him that higher‑dimensional forces are aiding Yu’s cause—though they cannot intervene directly.
He predicted that changes would begin next month: those who participated in Yu’s demise will see their fortunes crumble, and the key orchestrator will come under scrutiny—but not via the Yu case itself. He warned that the perpetrators will not be exposed under the banner of Yu’s case, to avoid drawing attention to deeper connections.
The investor also offered practical advice: Yu’s former studio registered multiple companies, so reporting those entities may draw official attention. He recommended persistently sending complaints to drain the suspects’ financial resources, reasoning that controlling public sentiment is costly—he estimated it could cost at least 100 million yuan every ten days. He encouraged netizens to sustain pressure for one to two months so that those responsible are forced to dig into their reserves, ultimately fomenting internal strife.
He added that he strongly believes an upcoming drama will face widespread boycott — not because of weak acting or directing, but because its screenwriter, Fang Li, is allegedly among the suspects involved in Yu Menglong’s case.
Mainland netizens rally around Yu Menglong’s death despite censorship
Yu Menglong’s death, shrouded in disturbing allegations and unanswered questions, has sparked a groundswell of outrage online. Despite the Chinese authorities’ efforts to suppress the story—refusing to open a formal investigation, punishing platforms, and detaining vocal citizens—netizens across the country continue to defy censorship. Their unified calls for justice have turned a tragic incident into a broader awakening of conscience. Many who had never followed Yu’s career now demand accountability on his behalf.
Some users noted that discussion around Yu’s death spikes during the early morning hours on Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok), when censors are less active. Strategically timing their posts, netizens aim to avoid mass deletions and keep the story alive.
In a recent livestream hosted by Beijing’s tourism board, viewers flooded the comment section with biting sarcasm aimed at the state narrative:
“How do Beijing residents go downstairs?”
“Is 37 a safe age to visit?”
“I wouldn’t dare go—what if I don’t live past 37?”
“Is this itinerary one-way only?”
“You leave Beijing a dreamer, return a ghost.”
“Freefall and extreme disco? No thanks!”
On October 8, a video surfaced showing a massive outdoor screen above the entrance of Wuyue Plaza in Jiangsu looping a series of close-ups of Yu Menglong. Though the display featured no sound, the haunting message read simply: “I am Yu Menglong.”
After the video appeared on Bilibili, China’s leading video-sharing platform, users commented that similar displays had appeared in multiple cities. One user posted: “October 8—we are here. Never abandon, never give up.” Another shared an image of Yu with a slogan: “One team, one cause. Fight together, win together.”
When the video reached X (formerly Twitter), overseas users chimed in with encouragement and admiration:
“These netizens are not to be messed with. Keep it up!”
“These self-funded displays are sparks of light—China’s hope for the future.”
“Yu Menglong was sent by God to bring down the CCP.”
“Water can carry a boat, but also capsize it. No regime survives when it turns against the people.”
This grassroots movement—resilient, creative, and emotionally charged—has transformed a silenced tragedy into a rallying cry for truth.
Click Here For The Original Source.
